New Label: Low Priority #44
-
|
Some open source projects have a "Low Priority" label they'll use. I feel this is an effective label because then when I look at issues I can see that they've been acknowledged, the team may even agree with them, but the team has more important work to do. This indicates to me that as a contributor I have several options at my disposal, if I feel it shouldn't be low priority and it's important I can add my voice to it. If I want more immediate results I can submit a PR for it. I propose we add this label to our list and make it a standard thing we put on issues. It will also explain why some issues are immediately closed and some hang around, it's not that we're inactive, it's that we've got more important work to do. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
-
|
This makes sense to us. We'll get one added and start applying it to things. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I marked this discussion with the label created. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
We've added this label, so I am going to lock this discussion |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
What does locking do?!? Cause I can totally reply |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Looks like members with write access to the repo can still comment after its locked, so...doesn't do much lol |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
We've added this label, so I am going to lock this discussion