Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add FASTQ input option to non-consented human split analysis #357

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 24, 2024

Conversation

dozy
Copy link
Member

@dozy dozy commented Oct 17, 2024

and remove blank lines from alignment_wtsi_stage2_template.json

remove blank lines from alignment_wtsi_stage2_template.json
@dozy dozy requested a review from jidur October 17, 2024 17:44
@jidur
Copy link
Contributor

jidur commented Oct 24, 2024

I tried this out with 48367_2#45 cram (merged human and target from iRODS) input and then fastq.qz input using the docker container ghcr.io/dozy/p4:ra00p4bwadg and it ran successfully giving similar results in both cases.
Running with realignment_switch set to 0 gave the samtools flagstat total count for the human split and target as in iRODS.

@jidur jidur merged commit f308f23 into wtsi-npg:devel Oct 24, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants