Refactor application-mgt component to utilize certificate-mgt component for certificate management

[ashanthamara]

Proposed changes in this pull request

• With this PR, application-mgt component will utilize certificate-mgt component for it's operations related to certificates and this will ensure that the application-mgt component will not perform any direct CRUD operations to the IDN_CERTIFICATE table.
• Also removed the certificate validation at the ApplicationManagementService since that particular validation is checked in the the certificate-mgt component. Hence added necessary Client Exception checks to catch that in the ApplicationDAOImpl

Related Issue:

• Refactor application-mgt component to utilize certificate-mgt component for certificate management product-is#21378

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 82.97872% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 40.57%. Comparing base (7f07a79) to head (116694b).
Report is 5 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...y/application/mgt/dao/impl/ApplicationDAOImpl.java	89.28%	6 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
...nternal/ApplicationManagementServiceComponent.java	0.00%	7 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #6087      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     40.69%   40.57%   -0.13%     
- Complexity    14446    14515      +69     
============================================
  Files          1762     1763       +1     
  Lines        117627   118725    +1098     
  Branches      19025    19302     +277     
============================================
+ Hits          47868    48168     +300     
- Misses        62476    63213     +737     
- Partials       7283     7344      +61     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	25.01% <82.97%> (+0.16%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[jenkins-is-staging]

PR builder started
Link: https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/11620418937

[jenkins-is-staging]

PR builder completed
Link: https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/11620418937
Status: failure

[jenkins-is-staging]

PR builder started
Link: https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/11636749915

[jenkins-is-staging]

PR builder completed
Link: https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/11636749915
Status: failure

[jenkins-is-staging]

PR builder started
Link: https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/11642804673

[jenkins-is-staging]

PR builder completed
Link: https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/11642804673
Status: success

[jenkins-is-staging]

Approving the pull request based on the successful pr build https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/11642804673

[jenkins-is-staging]

PR builder started
Link: https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/11645953009

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
8 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[jenkins-is-staging]

PR builder completed
Link: https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/11645953009
Status: success

[jenkins-is-staging]

Approving the pull request based on the successful pr build https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/11645953009