Fixes #6922 3.17: Hashes are not removed from the source when there is no LRC data

[Khadreal]

Description

Hashes should be removed when visiting uncached page that have [] LRC in DB

Fixes #6922

Type of change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).

Detailed scenario

Please check #6922 for detailed scenario.

Technical description

Updatehas_lrc method in LazyRenderContent database row to check for '[]' instead of 'not found' which doesn't exist in db records and updated the optimize method to return html without hashes when the logic checks passed.

Documentation

Hashes should be removed when visiting uncached page that have [] LRC in DB

Mandatory Checklist

Code validation

• I validated all the Acceptance Criteria. If possible, provide screenshots or videos.
• I triggered all changed lines of code at least once without new errors/warnings/notices.
• I implemented built-in tests to cover the new/changed code.

Code style

• I wrote a self-explanatory code about what it does.
• I did not introduce unnecessary complexity.

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
Report missing for 1d52f9d1	✅ 62.13% (target: 50.00%)

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (1d52f9d)	Report Missing	Report Missing	Report Missing
Head commit (0ea0a6b)	37911	16526	43.59%

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#6937)	573	356	62.13%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

_{Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

Footnotes

1. Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct. ↩

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ +0.04% (target: -0.10%)	✅ 100.00% (target: 50.00%)

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (88bfea5)	37910	16525	43.59%
Head commit (5c93aed)	37912 (+2)	16541 (+16)	43.63% (+0.04%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#6937)	5	5	100.00%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

_{Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

[Mai-Saad]

related test plan https://wpmediaqa.testrail.io/index.php?/runs/view/894

[MathieuLamiot]

Test plan all 🆗 for me. @wp-media/qa-team Feel free to merge or explore more if you prefer 👍