Update PrivacyQueryMapper for ACDP composition

[iverson52000]

No description provided.

[wfa-reviewable]

This change is 

[stevenwarejones]

Reviewed 3 of 3 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @iverson52000, @RibeiroAna, and @uakyol)

---

src/main/kotlin/org/wfanet/measurement/eventdataprovider/privacybudgetmanagement/api/v2alpha/PrivacyQueryMapper.kt line 29 at r1 (raw file):

import org.wfanet.measurement.eventdataprovider.privacybudgetmanagement.Reference

private const val SENSITIVITY = 1.0

this should initialized with the object/class imo

[iverson52000]

Reviewable status: 2 of 3 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @RibeiroAna, @stevenwarejones, and @uakyol)

---

src/main/kotlin/org/wfanet/measurement/eventdataprovider/privacybudgetmanagement/api/v2alpha/PrivacyQueryMapper.kt line 29 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, stevenwarejones (Steven Ware Jones) wrote…

this should initialized with the object/class imo

Done. Make sense thanks

[uakyol]

src/main/kotlin/org/wfanet/measurement/eventdataprovider/privacybudgetmanagement/api/v2alpha/PrivacyQueryMapper.kt line 29 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, iverson52000 (Albert Hsu) wrote…

Done. Make sense thanks

Do we ever want to initialize the PBM with a different sensitivity?

[stevenwarejones]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r2.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed (commit messages unreviewed), 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @RibeiroAna and @uakyol)

[uakyol]

Reviewed 2 of 3 files at r1, 1 of 1 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @RibeiroAna and @stevenwarejones)

---

src/main/kotlin/org/wfanet/measurement/eventdataprovider/privacybudgetmanagement/api/v2alpha/PrivacyQueryMapper.kt line 29 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, uakyol wrote…

Do we ever want to initialize the PBM with a different sensitivity?

Synced offline, seems we would need to do this.

[stevenwarejones]

Reviewed all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @RibeiroAna and @uakyol)

---

src/main/kotlin/org/wfanet/measurement/eventdataprovider/privacybudgetmanagement/api/v2alpha/PrivacyQueryMapper.kt line 29 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, uakyol wrote…

Synced offline, seems we would need to do this.

change this to a class with the sensitivity passed in to the constructor then?

[iverson52000]

Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @RibeiroAna and @stevenwarejones)

---

src/main/kotlin/org/wfanet/measurement/eventdataprovider/privacybudgetmanagement/api/v2alpha/PrivacyQueryMapper.kt line 29 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, stevenwarejones (Steven Ware Jones) wrote…

change this to a class with the sensitivity passed in to the constructor then?

The SENSITIVITY is subject to change in the future in some ways. From Pasin, the SENSITIVITY may be different from 1.0 for impression and duration. It may be fixed constant, or an output from another function depends on the design of other ACDP PBM add-on features. I suggest we leave PrivacyQueryMapper as it is for now and update it later when needed.

[stevenwarejones]

Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @RibeiroAna)