Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replaces Volley with Glide in ReaderPostDetail section #8075

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2018

Conversation

malinajirka
Copy link
Contributor

@malinajirka malinajirka commented Jul 23, 2018

Fixes #8074

Replaces Volley with Glide in the Reader Post Detail.

  • Avatar/Blavatar in the header is displayed with Glide - no change from the user perspective
  • Liked by section avatars are displayed with glide - no change from the user perspective
  • More in XYZ blog/More on WordPress.com avatar/blavatar/feature images are displayed with Glide - feature images can theoretically contain animated gif, however I'm not sure how to test it, since this section is picked 'randomly'. Nevertheless the ImageManager.load(..) method is used in many other places in the app and it loads GIF images correctly, so I'd just assume it'll work here as well.

The content of the post is displayed in a default WebView, so Glide is not used for images in the content area.

To test:

  1. Open detail of a post in Reader
  2. Make sure all the images mentioned above are correctly loaded.

Note: Can one of you review it please. Thanks!

@malinajirka malinajirka requested a review from nbradbury July 23, 2018 07:12
@malinajirka malinajirka added this to the 10.6 milestone Jul 23, 2018
@mzorz mzorz self-assigned this Jul 25, 2018
Copy link
Contributor

@mzorz mzorz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested, LGTM :shipit:

@mzorz mzorz merged commit 397ad97 into develop Jul 25, 2018
@mzorz mzorz deleted the feature/glide-post-detail branch July 25, 2018 18:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants