Document why we use our AJAX API for the Payment Request integration with Blocks #1588
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ricardo
requested changes
Jun 3, 2021
ricardo
approved these changes
Jun 4, 2021
ricardo
added
pr: needs author reply
pr: ready to merge
and removed
pr: needs review
labels
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes proposed in this Pull Request:
Fixes #1572
client/blocksin the form of aREADME.mdfile that explains why we chose to use our pre-existing AJAX APIs instead of the Blocks API.Testing instructions
N/A
Just review for content and spelling, obvious errors, etc.
grunt.