Skip to content

Lightweight, ruby-based language that provides a powerful way to make inlists for MESA projects.

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

wmwolf/MesaScript

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

64 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

MesaScript

MESA Requirement!

In its current state, MesaScript requires MESA rev. 5596 or above. This is due to a sensitivity to where the '.inc' files are stored on earlier versions. If there is demand for MesaScript for earlier revisions, I will look into making it backward compatible.

The Short Short Version

To get up and running fast, skip to installation, then try and use the included sample file, sample.rb (via running ruby sample.rb in the command line). The comments in sample.rb should get you started, especially if you have at least a little Ruby know-how.

Citing MesaScirpt

MesaScript has a DOI: DOI. If your work made significant use of MesaScript, please kindly cite it in your acknowledgements or your software section. It is stylized as "MesaScript", and I typically wrap it in \texttt{} in LaTeX.

What is MesaScript?

Lightweight, Ruby-based language that provides a powerful way to make inlists for MESA projects. Really, MesaScript is a DSL (domain-specific language) built on top of Ruby, so Ruby code "just works" inside MesaScript (if you're familiar with it, think of what SASS is to CSS, but on a smaller scale).

What does MesaScript do?

MesaScript provides a way to build inlists for use with MESA using Ruby, though you need not know much at all about Ruby to use it. The main point is that you can use variables when creating an inlist, making a reusable template for parameter space studies when only a few inlist commands vary between a large number of inlists. Most, if not all, of what MesaScript does can be done by using MESA's run_star_extras hooks, but for the purposes of documenting what I do with MESA, I find inlists more enlightening, and I try to stick to high-level languages whenever I can.

There are other benefits, too. MesaScript automatically checks your input to make sure that the types of arguments you give for various namelist items match what is expected, and the resulting inlist is neatly formatted and sensibly ordered. If you misspell a command, modern versions of ruby will even suggest valid replacements for you at runtime. You can also easily convert an existing inlist to MesaScript for editing and further generalization. In general, writing an inlist in MesaScript is no more difficult than writing a normal inlist, but you have far more flexibility. So why not give it a try?

If you know a little Ruby (want to learn? Try Ruby here!), the possibilities are pretty wide open. You could easily make a script that starts with a given set of parameters, run MESA star, then use the output of that run to dictate a new inlist and run, creating a chain (maybe a MESA root find of sorts).

Installation

MesaScript is now available as a gem! Assuming you have the gem command up and running (you probably do, but if not, check out RubyGems to get it up and running). Simply run

gem install mesa_script

and you should be good to go. You'll be able to include MesaScript in your ruby files with require 'mesa_script', and inlist2mesascript will be available to you from the command line to convert your existing inlists to mesascript files.

If you want to edit the source or don't want to use rubygems, clone or otherwise download the repository somewhere to your home directory with

git clone https://github.com/wmwolf/MesaScript.git ~/MesaScript

or somewhere else to your liking.

Then, either copy the file mesa_script.rb to somewhere along Ruby's path, or set up another stand-in file that points to your mesa_script.rb file in Ruby's path. To find Ruby's path, type

ruby -e 'puts $:'

in your terminal. If Ruby is properly configured, as it is on most modern Unix systems, you should see a list of possible directories. Either copy mesa_script.rb there or do what I do and make a new file called mesa_script.rb there and have it just be

require '/PATH/TO/YOUR/CLONED/REPOSITORY/mesa_script.rb'

This way, if you later update your repo via git pull, you won't need to copy mesa_script.rb again. Also, if you'd like to use the included (optional) inlist2mesascript tool, copy that to somewhere along you system's path ( echo $PATH). Then type inlist2mesascript -h to learn more about that tool. As you might guess, it takes an existing MESA inlist and converts it to a file in MesaScript that, if executed by Ruby should produce essentially the same inlist (good for moving a project to MesaScript).

To check if Ruby can see the file, try doing ruby -e 'require "mesa_script"'. If no error occurs, it is working fine.

Finally, you must have your MESA_DIR environment variable set for anything to work. The mesa_script.rb file generates all the necessary data it needs from the MESA source on the fly (this also makes it nearly MESA version independent).

Basic Usage

The mesa_script.rb file defines just one class, Inlist, which we'll interact with primarily through one class method, make_inlist. Just put the following in a file to make a blank inlist:

require 'mesa_script'

Inlist.make_inlist('babys_first_inlist') {
  # inlist commands go here
}

This creates a file called babys_first_inlist that will be pretty boring. It will create five namelists (the usual star_job, eos, kap, controls, and pgstar, though kap and eos will be excluded for older version of MESA) and leaves them blank inside, which is a perfectly acceptable inlist for MESA to use, since it has defaults available. Now let's say you put this in a file called my_first_mesascript.rb (.rb is the extension for Ruby files, by the way). Then to actually generate the inlist, enter ruby my_first_mesascript.rb at the command line and watch in awe as babys_first_inlist pops into existence. You've created an inlist using MesaScript, and you did so using fewer lines than it would have taken to actually make that inlist on your own (technically)!

Entering Inlist Commands

Making blank inlists is boring, so now let's cover how you actually make useful inlists. For mesa inlists, there are really only two types of declarations: those for scalars and those for array. Let's talk about scalars first, since they are far more common. Then we'll get to the more complicated array assignments.

Scalar Assignments

As an example, let's say we want to set the initial mass of our star to 2.0 solar masses. The inlist command for this is initial_mass. In a regular inlist file, we would need to put this in the proper namelist, &controls as initial_mass = 2.0. In MesaScript, there are two ways to do this:

initial_mass 2.0    # this
initial_mass(2.0)   # is the same as this

In Ruby, parentheses are optional for method calls, so either way is acceptable. Note that unlike in normal inlists, MesaScript doesn't care about the namelist this attribute belongs to. It'll figure it out on its own and place it appropriately.

WARNING: You cannot use the standard inlist notation of

initial_mass = 2.0  # DON'T EVER DO THIS EVER EVER EVER

it will not throw an error, because it will simply set a new Ruby variable called initial_mass. (For the person curious as to why I didn't program this functionality in, google something like "instance_eval setter method" to discover what took me too long to figure out.)

Array Assignments

As an example, let's say we want to set a lower limit on a certain central abundance as a stopping condition. Then we would, at the minimum, need to set the inlist command xa_central_lower_limit_species(1) = 'h1', for example. In MesaScript, there are three ways to do this:

xa_central_lower_limit_species[1] = 'h1'    # These are
xa_central_lower_limit_species(1, 'h1')     # all the
xa_central_lower_limit_species 1, 'h1'      # same

WARNING: Again, the standard inlist notation for array assignment will not work:

xa_central_lower_limit_species(1) = 'h1'    # THIS ENDS IN SADNESS

I tried to program this functionality in, and the kind people at StackOverflow kindly but firmly convinced me it was utterly impossible to to with Ruby without writing a parser of my own. Just stick to the bracket syntax or the less natural parentheses/space notations.

Other Details

That's really all you need to know to start making inlists with MesaScript, though I should remind you, especially if you aren't familiar with Ruby, about the basic types of entries you might use. Most inlist commands are one of the following: booleans, strings, floats, or integers.

Booleans in Ruby are true and false (case matters, and no periods).

Strings work the same as in fortran, though single quotes are more "literal" than double quotes. Double quotes allow for escaped characters and string interpolation using the #{...} notation, which might be useful. For instance,

my_mass = 2.0
initial_mass my_mass
save_model true
save_model_filename "my_star_#{my_mass}.mod"

will produce (among other things) the line save_model_filename = 'my_star_2.0.mod' in the resulting inlist. Note also the utility of having the initial mass and the save file name being dependent on a single variable.

Integers are just integers (I don't know of a useful literal other than just typing out the entire number, though you can use underscores to make it clearer, e.g. 100_000_000 is the same as 100000000 in Ruby).

Floats use an "e", and never a "d" for an exponential indicator, e.g. 6.02e23. Ruby floats have arbitrary precision, so there are no doubles.

Finally, if a particular command is giving you trouble, you can always just encase what you want it to be (i.e. in Fortran lingo) in quotes (obviously this does nothing useful if MesaScript is expecting a string). For example

mass_change 1e-7

will have the same effect as

mass_change '1d-7'

since MesaScript will not try to parse '1d-7'. It was expecting a float, but since it got a string, it assumes you know better than it.

A useful tidbit is that methods are case sensitive to a point. They have the same "spelling" as what is found in the .inc file (like star/private/star_controls.inc), but every method has an aliased method that is the same, but all in lower case, so you don't need to remember the capitalization so long as you remember the actual spelling.

Any Ruby inside the make_inlist block will be executed normally, and it can see variables named outside of the block. So if you have some basic parameters that can determine a large number of inlist commands, you can simply name those parameters as variables at the top of your MesaScript file and then make the actual MesaScript code weave them into your inlist appropriately. This way, the actual parameter changing from inlist to inlist is taken outside of the actual inlist commands so you don't forget to change a particular command when you move on to a different run (like forgetting to change a LOG_dir, which I've done a few too many times and thus overwritten some data).

Deeper and Deeper...

Are you still reading this? Well, you must want to do more.

Using Custom Namelists

You can also make MesaScript know about additional namelists (or forget about the standard five/three). After requiring the mesa_script file, you can change the namelists it cares about via the following commands (obviously subbing out any string containing 'namelist1' or 'namelist2' with your own appropriate strings):

require 'mesa_script'

Inlist.config_namelist(
    namelist: 'namelist1',
    source_files: 'path/to/my/module/private/namelist1_controls.inc',
    default_file: 'path/to/my/module/defaults/namelist1.defaults')
)

Source files are the files where the different controls are defined. For example, see $MESA_DIR/star/private/star_job_controls.inc for the file for star_job. Note that there may be more than one of these that need to be read in, as is the case with controls (star/private/star_controls.inc and star/private/ctrls_io.f90). In those cases, you can set source_files to an array. default_files should just be the defaults file you are used to referencing, like star/defaults/star_job.defaults for star_job.

After this line, any subsequent calls to Inlist will know only about namelist1. You could make subsequent similar calls for the more common namelists, but there are shortcuts. To get the main star namelists, just do

Inlist.add_star_job_defaults
Inlist.add_kap_defaults
Inlist.add_eos_defaults
Inlist.add_controls_defaults
Inlist.add_pgstar_defaults

or even more succinctly,

Inlist.add_star_defaults

which does all five in one go (but it skips eos and kap for older versions of MESA). The most common bonus namelists you might also want are the binary_job and binary_controls namelists, which have their own shortcuts as well: Inlist.add_binary_job and Inlist.add_binary_controls_defaults (and the more succinct Inlist.add_binary_defaults to do both). Note, though, that at least one command (log_directory) is present in both controls and binary_controls, so MesaScript will fail to execute one of them as it will only register the control as belonging to one namelist. There is no guarantee that more controls won't have name collisions in the future other than isolating which namelists are read in.

If you don't specify any extra namelists (99% of use cases), it just defaults to reading in the five/three main star namelists.

Accessing Current Values and Displaying Default Values

Perhaps you want to display a default value in your inlist, but not actually change it. Well, most of the assignment methods mentioned earlier are also getter methods. I haven't mentioned how these methods actually work, so I'll do so now since you're still reading this manifesto.

These methods first flag the name of the data category for going into the inlist. Then if a new value is supplied to them, it changes the value in the Inlist object's internal hash. Then, when all the user-supplied code has been executed, it gathers all the flagged data and formats it into properly-formatted namelists, which it then prints out in sequence to the file name provided by the user. One final note about these methods, they always return the value associated with the inlist object (the new one if you assign it, or the current/default value if you don't set one).

So if you want to access any scalar, just call its method without an argument. Not only does this return the default value, but it also flags the category for inclusion in the inlist so

    save_this_value = initial_mass

will set save_this_value to 1.0 (the default value in controls.defaults) unless you had already assigned another value, in which case that would be saved instead. Additionally, initial_mass = 1.0 will appear in the final inlist, even though we didn't give initial_mass a new value. In fact, we could just have a line like

    initial_z

that neither uses the return value nor changes the stored value. This will just flag initial_z for being put in the final inlist. Note that there is currently no way to unflag an inlist item.

For arrays, things work like you might expect. Any time any one of the versions of the array methods are called, that entire array category is staged for inclusion in the inlist. For example, you could do any of the following:

    xa_central_lower_limit      # returns a hash of values
    xa_central_lower_limit[1]   # returns the value associated with 1 in the hash
    xa_central_lower_limit(1)   # same as above
    xa_central_lower_limit 1    # same as above

Note that these array methods, as indicated, point to hashes (not arrays) of values. So xa_central_lower_limit_species[1] = 'h1' would return {1 => 'h1'}.

Further Work

I warmly welcome bug reports, feature suggestions, and most all, pull requests!

About

Lightweight, ruby-based language that provides a powerful way to make inlists for MESA projects.

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Packages

No packages published

Contributors 3

  •  
  •  
  •  

Languages