Linux 515.1633+ compat, add signature checking function for development #92
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Absolucy
commented
Sep 5, 2024
| #[macro_export] | ||
| macro_rules! count { | ||
| () => (0usize); | ||
| ( $x:tt $($xs:tt)* ) => (1_usize + count!($($xs)*)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
trust me you do not want to see this in cargo expand
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
this updates the Linux sigs, and also adds a new exported function:
auxtools_check_signaturesit just returns either
SUCCESSor something likeMISSING: call_proc_by_id, get_variable, call_datum_proc_by_name, get_assoc_element, set_assoc_element- just makes it easy to see which sigs need to be updated, all in one go.credit to @checkraisefold for linux 515.1633 sigs (which work up to 1642+)