Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New rule: no-fx #340

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024
Merged

New rule: no-fx #340

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

edg2s
Copy link
Member

@edg2s edg2s commented Nov 19, 2024

In slim mode, $.fx is completely missing, so create a rule
for this (more generic that no-fx-interval, which exists as
that property is deprecated).

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (5fc1937) to head (442d418).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #340   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          104       105    +1     
  Lines          625       631    +6     
=========================================
+ Hits           625       631    +6     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/index.js 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/rules/no-fx.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
---- 🚨 Try these New Features:

In slim mode, $.fx is completely missing, so create a rule
for this (more generic that no-fx-interval, which exists as
that property is deprecated).
@jdforrester jdforrester merged commit 387002b into master Nov 19, 2024
6 checks passed
@jdforrester jdforrester deleted the no-fx branch November 19, 2024 17:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants