-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Library makes no distinction between utilities and traversal methods with the same name #3
Comments
cc @Krinkle @jdforrester @jdlrobson We need to come up with a new naming scheme to resolve these conflicts, currently the only rule is: A couple of options:
4 would necessarily be a breaking change, but I'm not that concerned about that. In 1/2 we could leave no-each as is, or deprecated/remove it. Thoughts? |
My preference order is 2 > 1 > 3 > 4. |
I'd probably go with |
`no-find-util` is being considered for removal in jQuery 4. Part of #3
`no-find-util` is being considered for removal in jQuery 4. Part of #3
(moved from dgraham/eslint-plugin-jquery#29, project assumed inactive)
There are two separate methods called 'each' with different documentation pages:
The same is true of 'map':
Update: This task applies to every rule that uses
createCollectionOrUtilMethodRule
. Although often the utils are not officially documented, some will be getting deprecated in the future (e.g. $.find):no-attr
no-clone
no-css
no-data
no-each
no-filter
no-find
no-map
no-prop
no-text
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: