Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Should we match the ES spelling of "unscopable" #103

Closed
bzbarsky opened this issue Mar 25, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Should we match the ES spelling of "unscopable" #103

bzbarsky opened this issue Mar 25, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@bzbarsky
Copy link
Collaborator

ES has Symbol.unscopable". IDL has[Unscopeable]` (with the 'e').

Note that this will require changes to DOM and the like...
@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Mar 26, 2016

Happy to update DOM.

@bzbarsky
Copy link
Collaborator Author

OK. I don't think anything other than DOM will need changes here.

@heycam heycam closed this as completed in 84a63a5 Apr 5, 2016
annevk added a commit to whatwg/dom that referenced this issue Apr 6, 2016
@annevk
Align spelling of Unscopable with IDL and JavaScript
cd643f8 
See whatwg/webidl#103 for context.
@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Apr 6, 2016

Updated DOM as well.

Zirro added a commit to Zirro/webidl2js that referenced this issue Nov 25, 2017
@Zirro
[Unscopeable] is now [Unscopable]
ccd6279 
Changed in whatwg/webidl#103
@Zirro Zirro mentioned this issue Nov 25, 2017
Merged
TimothyGu pushed a commit to jsdom/webidl2js that referenced this issue Nov 25, 2017
@Zirro @TimothyGu
[Unscopeable] is now [Unscopable] (#95)
a0159a3 
Changed in whatwg/webidl#103
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@bzbarsky @annevk