Add meta methods: dupe_at_threshold_<n>? #63
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
westonplatter
approved these changes
May 19, 2017
|
@MatzFan thanks for the pull request. Looks good to me. Merging. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In my problem domain (& I guess many others) I am happy with a set custom threshold and do not need to change it in every
#duplicate?method call. I've therefore added a set of 'duplicate' methods with fixed, custom thresholds, created at require time. In testing with a cross comparison of around 10,000 images for duplicates, using one of the meta methods (e.g.#dupe_at_threshold_7?) gave a 40% + performance improvement vs. using#duplicate?which reads from a threshold parameter on each call.