Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: use LTS node version in lint job #207

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2023

Conversation

ersachin3112
Copy link
Contributor

@ersachin3112 ersachin3112 commented Feb 4, 2023

This PR contains a:

  • bugfix
  • new feature
  • code refactor
  • test update
  • typo fix
  • metadata update

Motivation / Use-Case

Use the Node.js LTS version syntax so we don't have to manually update node-version in future.

Breaking Changes

No

Additional Info

No

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 4, 2023

Codecov Report

Base: 100.00% // Head: 100.00% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (e299e42) compared to base (6713b0e).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #207   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            7         7           
  Lines          282       282           
  Branches        78        78           
=========================================
  Hits           282       282           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@ricardogobbosouza ricardogobbosouza merged commit 0df0835 into webpack-contrib:master Feb 6, 2023
@ersachin3112 ersachin3112 deleted the use-lts branch March 25, 2023 01:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants