Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Aryeh's base64 test. #11

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2012
Merged

Update Aryeh's base64 test. #11

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2012

Conversation

Ms2ger
Copy link
Contributor

@Ms2ger Ms2ger commented Dec 20, 2012

Doing this by itself so I don't have to look at the reflection tests just to land this change.

--HG--
branch : atob
Ms2ger added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2012
Update Aryeh's base64 test.
@Ms2ger Ms2ger merged commit aec18c3 into web-platform-tests:master Dec 20, 2012
alancutter pushed a commit to alancutter/web-platform-tests that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2016
Upstream animation-effect-timing-defaults.html from Blink
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 20, 2017

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 20, 2017

@wpt-pr-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Notifying @ayg, @jdm, @jgraham, @zcorpan, and @zqzhang. (Learn how reviewing works.)

1 similar comment
@wpt-pr-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Notifying @ayg, @jdm, @jgraham, @zcorpan, and @zqzhang. (Learn how reviewing works.)

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 29, 2017

View the complete job log.

Firefox (nightly channel)

Testing web-platform-tests at revision 05b2287
Using browser at version BuildID 20170329100319; SourceStamp 272ce6c2572164f5f6a9fba2a980ba9ccf50770c
Starting 10 test iterations
All results were stable

All results

1 test ran
/url/historical.html
Subtest Results Messages
OK
searchParams on location object PASS
searchParams on a element PASS
searchParams on area element PASS
Setting URL's href attribute and base URLs PASS
URL.domainToASCII should be undefined PASS
URL.domainToUnicode should be undefined PASS

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 29, 2017

View the complete job log.

Chrome (unstable channel)

Testing web-platform-tests at revision 05b2287
Using browser at version 59.0.3053.3 dev
Starting 10 test iterations
All results were stable

All results

1 test ran
/url/historical.html
Subtest Results Messages
OK
searchParams on location object PASS
searchParams on a element PASS
searchParams on area element PASS
Setting URL's href attribute and base URLs FAIL assert_throws: function "function () {\n url.href = "./bar";\n }" did not throw
URL.domainToASCII should be undefined PASS
URL.domainToUnicode should be undefined PASS

jugglinmike referenced this pull request in bocoup/wpt Apr 11, 2017
Add less/greater than (or equals) assertions
jgraham added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2017
jgraham added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2017
Ensure that all path separators in openssl config on windows are written \\ not \
jgraham pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2017
Add namespaced send command primitives
jgraham added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2017
Add mozinfo information from mozinfo.json files.
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2019
chromedriver doesn't allow changing Object.prototype to add enumerable
properties, but this test requires setting some values on
Object.prototype.  When Object.prototype.a is set to:

  {b: {c: 'on proto'}}

chromedriver fails with:

    JavascriptErrorException: javascript error (500): Maximum call stack size exceeded
      (Session info: chrome=72.0.3626.121)

    Remote-end stacktrace:

    #0 0x563ff3a32a59 <unknown>
    #1 0x563ff39cb7f3 <unknown>
    #2 0x563ff38fcd7c <unknown>
    #3 0x563ff38ff78c <unknown>
    #4 0x563ff38ff5f7 <unknown>
    #5 0x563ff38ffbe7 <unknown>
    #6 0x563ff38fff1b <unknown>
    #7 0x563ff38a3f7a <unknown>
    #8 0x563ff3899bf2 <unknown>
    #9 0x563ff38a37b7 <unknown>
    #10 0x563ff3899ac3 <unknown>
    #11 0x563ff38782d2 <unknown>
    #12 0x563ff3879112 <unknown>
    #13 0x563ff39fe865 <unknown>
    #14 0x563ff39ff32b <unknown>
    #15 0x563ff39ff70c <unknown>
    #16 0x563ff39d940a <unknown>
    #17 0x563ff39ff997 <unknown>
    #18 0x563ff39e9947 <unknown>
    #19 0x563ff3a1a800 <unknown>
    #20 0x563ff3a3c8be <unknown>
    #21 0x7f3bf4545494 start_thread
    #22 0x7f3bf2d58a8f clone

    Ran 1 tests finished in 2.0 seconds.
      • 0 ran as expected. 0 tests skipped.
      • 1 tests had errors unexpectedly

Work around this problem by cleaning up the test environment so
Object.prototype no longer has the override by the time chromedriver
tries to inspect the test result.

While here, fix the other tests to use the t.add_cleanup() function
so they'll cleanup their test environment in case they exit in
some other way besides reaching t.done().

The underlying chromedriver issue is tracked upstream at
https://crbug.com/chromedriver/2555.

Bug: 934844
Change-Id: Id1b4ab2a908bfbc001e2a2d045eeec3ef01c24d9
Hexcles pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2019
chromedriver doesn't allow changing Object.prototype to add enumerable
properties, but this test requires setting some values on
Object.prototype.  When Object.prototype.a is set to:

  {b: {c: 'on proto'}}

chromedriver fails with:

    JavascriptErrorException: javascript error (500): Maximum call stack size exceeded
      (Session info: chrome=72.0.3626.121)

    Remote-end stacktrace:

    #0 0x563ff3a32a59 <unknown>
    #1 0x563ff39cb7f3 <unknown>
    #2 0x563ff38fcd7c <unknown>
    #3 0x563ff38ff78c <unknown>
    #4 0x563ff38ff5f7 <unknown>
    #5 0x563ff38ffbe7 <unknown>
    #6 0x563ff38fff1b <unknown>
    #7 0x563ff38a3f7a <unknown>
    #8 0x563ff3899bf2 <unknown>
    #9 0x563ff38a37b7 <unknown>
    #10 0x563ff3899ac3 <unknown>
    #11 0x563ff38782d2 <unknown>
    #12 0x563ff3879112 <unknown>
    #13 0x563ff39fe865 <unknown>
    #14 0x563ff39ff32b <unknown>
    #15 0x563ff39ff70c <unknown>
    #16 0x563ff39d940a <unknown>
    #17 0x563ff39ff997 <unknown>
    #18 0x563ff39e9947 <unknown>
    #19 0x563ff3a1a800 <unknown>
    #20 0x563ff3a3c8be <unknown>
    #21 0x7f3bf4545494 start_thread
    #22 0x7f3bf2d58a8f clone

    Ran 1 tests finished in 2.0 seconds.
      • 0 ran as expected. 0 tests skipped.
      • 1 tests had errors unexpectedly

Work around this problem by cleaning up the test environment so
Object.prototype no longer has the override by the time chromedriver
tries to inspect the test result.

While here, fix the other tests to use the t.add_cleanup() function
so they'll cleanup their test environment in case they exit in
some other way besides reaching t.done().

The underlying chromedriver issue is tracked upstream at
https://crbug.com/chromedriver/2555.

Bug: 934844
Change-Id: Id1b4ab2a908bfbc001e2a2d045eeec3ef01c24d9
Hexcles pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2019
chromedriver doesn't allow changing Object.prototype to add enumerable
properties, but this test requires setting some values on
Object.prototype.  When Object.prototype.a is set to:

  {b: {c: 'on proto'}}

chromedriver fails with:

    JavascriptErrorException: javascript error (500): Maximum call stack size exceeded
      (Session info: chrome=72.0.3626.121)

    Remote-end stacktrace:

    #0 0x563ff3a32a59 <unknown>
    #1 0x563ff39cb7f3 <unknown>
    #2 0x563ff38fcd7c <unknown>
    #3 0x563ff38ff78c <unknown>
    #4 0x563ff38ff5f7 <unknown>
    #5 0x563ff38ffbe7 <unknown>
    #6 0x563ff38fff1b <unknown>
    #7 0x563ff38a3f7a <unknown>
    #8 0x563ff3899bf2 <unknown>
    #9 0x563ff38a37b7 <unknown>
    #10 0x563ff3899ac3 <unknown>
    #11 0x563ff38782d2 <unknown>
    #12 0x563ff3879112 <unknown>
    #13 0x563ff39fe865 <unknown>
    #14 0x563ff39ff32b <unknown>
    #15 0x563ff39ff70c <unknown>
    #16 0x563ff39d940a <unknown>
    #17 0x563ff39ff997 <unknown>
    #18 0x563ff39e9947 <unknown>
    #19 0x563ff3a1a800 <unknown>
    #20 0x563ff3a3c8be <unknown>
    #21 0x7f3bf4545494 start_thread
    #22 0x7f3bf2d58a8f clone

    Ran 1 tests finished in 2.0 seconds.
      • 0 ran as expected. 0 tests skipped.
      • 1 tests had errors unexpectedly

Work around this problem by cleaning up the test environment so
Object.prototype no longer has the override by the time chromedriver
tries to inspect the test result.

While here, fix the other tests to use the t.add_cleanup() function
so they'll cleanup their test environment in case they exit in
some other way besides reaching t.done().

The underlying chromedriver issue is tracked upstream at
https://crbug.com/chromedriver/2555.

Bug: 934844
Change-Id: Id1b4ab2a908bfbc001e2a2d045eeec3ef01c24d9
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2019
Flow relative longhands have been added to overscroll-behavior. [1]

TODO:

This is not yet functional as I think we need to teach css parser to map
inline/block to their physical counterparts x/y. Something similar to
direction_aware_properties [2] but only on the axes. There may be other
simpler way to do this.

Currently this crashes in [3].

[1] https://drafts.csswg.org/css-overscroll-behavior-1/#overscroll-behavior-longhands-logical
[2] https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/third_party/blink/renderer/core/css/css_properties.json5?q=css_properties.json5&sq=package:chromium&dr&l=332

[3] Current crash:

STDERR: [1:1:0516/112659.776302:FATAL:css_property_parser_helpers.cc(1928)] Check failed: shorthand.length() == 2u (4 vs. 2)
STDERR: #0 0x7f40c88436b1 base::debug::CollectStackTrace()
STDERR: #1 0x7f40c8593bfd base::debug::StackTrace::StackTrace()
STDERR: #2 0x7f40c8593bb8 base::debug::StackTrace::StackTrace()
STDERR: #3 0x7f40c85e2829 logging::LogMessage::~LogMessage()
STDERR: #4 0x7f40b025e6bd blink::css_property_parser_helpers::ConsumeShorthandVia2Longhands()
STDERR: #5 0x7f40b0331909 blink::css_shorthand::OverscrollBehavior::ParseShorthand()
STDERR: #6 0x7f40b025782a blink::CSSPropertyParser::ParseValueStart()
STDERR: #7 0x7f40b0256e35 blink::CSSPropertyParser::ParseValue()
STDERR: #8 0x7f40b02456ec blink::CSSParserImpl::ConsumeDeclarationValue()
STDERR: #9 0x7f40b02455be blink::CSSParserImpl::ParseValue()
STDERR: #10 0x7f40b023956a blink::CSSParser::ParseValue()
STDERR: #11 0x7f40b02394f4 blink::CSSParser::ParseValue()
STDERR: #12 0x7f40b00ef77f blink::MutableCSSPropertyValueSet::SetProperty()
STDERR: #13 0x7f40b004c5a9 blink::AbstractPropertySetCSSStyleDeclaration::SetPropertyInternal()

Change-Id: I5ceefa0afb1913472c0e134b2ec07405154abfae
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2019
Flow relative longhands have been added to overscroll-behavior. [1]

TODO:

This is not yet functional as I think we need to teach css parser to map
inline/block to their physical counterparts x/y. Something similar to
direction_aware_properties [2] but only on the axes. There may be other
simpler way to do this.

Currently this crashes in [3].

[1] https://drafts.csswg.org/css-overscroll-behavior-1/#overscroll-behavior-longhands-logical
[2] https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/third_party/blink/renderer/core/css/css_properties.json5?q=css_properties.json5&sq=package:chromium&dr&l=332

[3] Current crash:

STDERR: [1:1:0516/112659.776302:FATAL:css_property_parser_helpers.cc(1928)] Check failed: shorthand.length() == 2u (4 vs. 2)
STDERR: #0 0x7f40c88436b1 base::debug::CollectStackTrace()
STDERR: #1 0x7f40c8593bfd base::debug::StackTrace::StackTrace()
STDERR: #2 0x7f40c8593bb8 base::debug::StackTrace::StackTrace()
STDERR: #3 0x7f40c85e2829 logging::LogMessage::~LogMessage()
STDERR: #4 0x7f40b025e6bd blink::css_property_parser_helpers::ConsumeShorthandVia2Longhands()
STDERR: #5 0x7f40b0331909 blink::css_shorthand::OverscrollBehavior::ParseShorthand()
STDERR: #6 0x7f40b025782a blink::CSSPropertyParser::ParseValueStart()
STDERR: #7 0x7f40b0256e35 blink::CSSPropertyParser::ParseValue()
STDERR: #8 0x7f40b02456ec blink::CSSParserImpl::ConsumeDeclarationValue()
STDERR: #9 0x7f40b02455be blink::CSSParserImpl::ParseValue()
STDERR: #10 0x7f40b023956a blink::CSSParser::ParseValue()
STDERR: #11 0x7f40b02394f4 blink::CSSParser::ParseValue()
STDERR: #12 0x7f40b00ef77f blink::MutableCSSPropertyValueSet::SetProperty()
STDERR: #13 0x7f40b004c5a9 blink::AbstractPropertySetCSSStyleDeclaration::SetPropertyInternal()

Change-Id: I5ceefa0afb1913472c0e134b2ec07405154abfae
marcoscaceres pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2019
chromedriver doesn't allow changing Object.prototype to add enumerable
properties, but this test requires setting some values on
Object.prototype.  When Object.prototype.a is set to:

  {b: {c: 'on proto'}}

chromedriver fails with:

    JavascriptErrorException: javascript error (500): Maximum call stack size exceeded
      (Session info: chrome=72.0.3626.121)

    Remote-end stacktrace:

    #0 0x563ff3a32a59 <unknown>
    #1 0x563ff39cb7f3 <unknown>
    #2 0x563ff38fcd7c <unknown>
    #3 0x563ff38ff78c <unknown>
    #4 0x563ff38ff5f7 <unknown>
    #5 0x563ff38ffbe7 <unknown>
    #6 0x563ff38fff1b <unknown>
    #7 0x563ff38a3f7a <unknown>
    #8 0x563ff3899bf2 <unknown>
    #9 0x563ff38a37b7 <unknown>
    #10 0x563ff3899ac3 <unknown>
    #11 0x563ff38782d2 <unknown>
    #12 0x563ff3879112 <unknown>
    #13 0x563ff39fe865 <unknown>
    #14 0x563ff39ff32b <unknown>
    #15 0x563ff39ff70c <unknown>
    #16 0x563ff39d940a <unknown>
    #17 0x563ff39ff997 <unknown>
    #18 0x563ff39e9947 <unknown>
    #19 0x563ff3a1a800 <unknown>
    #20 0x563ff3a3c8be <unknown>
    #21 0x7f3bf4545494 start_thread
    #22 0x7f3bf2d58a8f clone

    Ran 1 tests finished in 2.0 seconds.
      • 0 ran as expected. 0 tests skipped.
      • 1 tests had errors unexpectedly

Work around this problem by cleaning up the test environment so
Object.prototype no longer has the override by the time chromedriver
tries to inspect the test result.

While here, fix the other tests to use the t.add_cleanup() function
so they'll cleanup their test environment in case they exit in
some other way besides reaching t.done().

The underlying chromedriver issue is tracked upstream at
https://crbug.com/chromedriver/2555.

Bug: 934844
Change-Id: Id1b4ab2a908bfbc001e2a2d045eeec3ef01c24d9
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2019
…iner height

See stack trace below. We set the override container logical height to -1
for the initial layout of a flex item so that we compute the correct size
for min-height. However, that messes with our cache for definite heights
because we would always set it to indefinite in such a case.

Instead, just don't cache these values. That way we will later compute the right
thing for resolving flex-basis, etc.

(FlexNG can't come soon enough...)

 #0  blink::LayoutBox::ContainingBlockLogicalHeightForPercentageResolution (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    out_cb=0x7f6e7d42d8c0, out_skipped_auto_height_containing_block=0x0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_box.cc:3833
 #1  0x00007f6ee84ad0a1 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::MainAxisLengthIsDefinite (this=0x3dda8d434010,
    child=..., flex_basis=Length(0%, Percent), add_to_cb=false)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:762
 #2  0x00007f6ee84af930 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::MainSizeIsDefiniteForPercentageResolution (
    this=0x3dda8d434010, child=...)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:1125
 #3  0x00007f6ee84ad7f5 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::UseOverrideLogicalHeightForPerentageResolution (
    this=0x3dda8d434010, child=...)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:1137
 #4  0x00007f6ee83f2b9d in blink::LayoutBlock::AvailableLogicalHeightForPercentageComputation (
    this=0x3dda8d434198) at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_block.cc:2333
 #5  0x00007f6ee845e745 in blink::LayoutBox::ContainingBlockLogicalHeightForPercentageResolution (
    this=0x3dda8d4243d0, out_cb=0x0, out_skipped_auto_height_containing_block=0x0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_box.cc:3830
 #6  0x00007f6ee86dcc5c in blink::LayoutBoxUtils::AvailableLogicalHeight (box=..., cb=0x3dda8d434198)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/ng/layout_box_utils.cc:64
 #7  0x00007f6ee86eafea in blink::LayoutNGMixin<blink::LayoutBlockFlow>::ComputeIntrinsicLogicalWidths (
    this=0x3dda8d4243d0, min_logical_width=0px, max_logical_width=0px)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/ng/layout_ng_mixin.cc:48
 #8  0x00007f6ee83ef53a in blink::LayoutBlock::ComputePreferredLogicalWidths (this=0x3dda8d4243d0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_block.cc:1509
 #9  0x00007f6ee8451f01 in blink::LayoutBox::MaxPreferredLogicalWidth (this=0x3dda8d4243d0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_box.cc:1395
 #10 0x00007f6ee84adba2 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::ComputeInnerFlexBaseSizeForChild (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    child=..., main_axis_border_and_padding=0px, child_layout_type=blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::kForceLayout)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:890
 #11 0x00007f6ee84ae5d1 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::ConstructAndAppendFlexItem (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    algorithm=0x7f6e7d42ed70, child=..., layout_type=blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::kForceLayout)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:1203
 #12 0x00007f6ee84aa27b in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::LayoutFlexItems (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    relayout_children=true, layout_scope=...)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:934
 #13 0x00007f6ee84a9cff in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::UpdateBlockLayout (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    relayout_children=true) at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:369

Bug: 1019138
Change-Id: Ie94e69a5f3fe6accc3623d358315b174088d5597
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2019
…iner height

See stack trace below. We set the override container logical height to -1
for the initial layout of a flex item so that we compute the correct size
for min-height. However, that messes with our cache for definite heights
because we would always set it to indefinite in such a case.

Instead, just don't cache these values. That way we will later compute the right
thing for resolving flex-basis, etc.

(FlexNG can't come soon enough...)

 #0  blink::LayoutBox::ContainingBlockLogicalHeightForPercentageResolution (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    out_cb=0x7f6e7d42d8c0, out_skipped_auto_height_containing_block=0x0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_box.cc:3833
 #1  0x00007f6ee84ad0a1 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::MainAxisLengthIsDefinite (this=0x3dda8d434010,
    child=..., flex_basis=Length(0%, Percent), add_to_cb=false)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:762
 #2  0x00007f6ee84af930 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::MainSizeIsDefiniteForPercentageResolution (
    this=0x3dda8d434010, child=...)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:1125
 #3  0x00007f6ee84ad7f5 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::UseOverrideLogicalHeightForPerentageResolution (
    this=0x3dda8d434010, child=...)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:1137
 #4  0x00007f6ee83f2b9d in blink::LayoutBlock::AvailableLogicalHeightForPercentageComputation (
    this=0x3dda8d434198) at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_block.cc:2333
 #5  0x00007f6ee845e745 in blink::LayoutBox::ContainingBlockLogicalHeightForPercentageResolution (
    this=0x3dda8d4243d0, out_cb=0x0, out_skipped_auto_height_containing_block=0x0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_box.cc:3830
 #6  0x00007f6ee86dcc5c in blink::LayoutBoxUtils::AvailableLogicalHeight (box=..., cb=0x3dda8d434198)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/ng/layout_box_utils.cc:64
 #7  0x00007f6ee86eafea in blink::LayoutNGMixin<blink::LayoutBlockFlow>::ComputeIntrinsicLogicalWidths (
    this=0x3dda8d4243d0, min_logical_width=0px, max_logical_width=0px)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/ng/layout_ng_mixin.cc:48
 #8  0x00007f6ee83ef53a in blink::LayoutBlock::ComputePreferredLogicalWidths (this=0x3dda8d4243d0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_block.cc:1509
 #9  0x00007f6ee8451f01 in blink::LayoutBox::MaxPreferredLogicalWidth (this=0x3dda8d4243d0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_box.cc:1395
 #10 0x00007f6ee84adba2 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::ComputeInnerFlexBaseSizeForChild (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    child=..., main_axis_border_and_padding=0px, child_layout_type=blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::kForceLayout)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:890
 #11 0x00007f6ee84ae5d1 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::ConstructAndAppendFlexItem (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    algorithm=0x7f6e7d42ed70, child=..., layout_type=blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::kForceLayout)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:1203
 #12 0x00007f6ee84aa27b in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::LayoutFlexItems (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    relayout_children=true, layout_scope=...)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:934
 #13 0x00007f6ee84a9cff in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::UpdateBlockLayout (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    relayout_children=true) at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:369

Bug: 1019138
Change-Id: Ie94e69a5f3fe6accc3623d358315b174088d5597
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2019
…iner height

See stack trace below. We set the override container logical height to -1
for the initial layout of a flex item so that we compute the correct size
for min-height. However, that messes with our cache for definite heights
because we would always set it to indefinite in such a case.

Instead, just don't cache these values. That way we will later compute the right
thing for resolving flex-basis, etc.

(FlexNG can't come soon enough...)

 #0  blink::LayoutBox::ContainingBlockLogicalHeightForPercentageResolution (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    out_cb=0x7f6e7d42d8c0, out_skipped_auto_height_containing_block=0x0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_box.cc:3833
 #1  0x00007f6ee84ad0a1 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::MainAxisLengthIsDefinite (this=0x3dda8d434010,
    child=..., flex_basis=Length(0%, Percent), add_to_cb=false)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:762
 #2  0x00007f6ee84af930 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::MainSizeIsDefiniteForPercentageResolution (
    this=0x3dda8d434010, child=...)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:1125
 #3  0x00007f6ee84ad7f5 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::UseOverrideLogicalHeightForPerentageResolution (
    this=0x3dda8d434010, child=...)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:1137
 #4  0x00007f6ee83f2b9d in blink::LayoutBlock::AvailableLogicalHeightForPercentageComputation (
    this=0x3dda8d434198) at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_block.cc:2333
 #5  0x00007f6ee845e745 in blink::LayoutBox::ContainingBlockLogicalHeightForPercentageResolution (
    this=0x3dda8d4243d0, out_cb=0x0, out_skipped_auto_height_containing_block=0x0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_box.cc:3830
 #6  0x00007f6ee86dcc5c in blink::LayoutBoxUtils::AvailableLogicalHeight (box=..., cb=0x3dda8d434198)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/ng/layout_box_utils.cc:64
 #7  0x00007f6ee86eafea in blink::LayoutNGMixin<blink::LayoutBlockFlow>::ComputeIntrinsicLogicalWidths (
    this=0x3dda8d4243d0, min_logical_width=0px, max_logical_width=0px)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/ng/layout_ng_mixin.cc:48
 #8  0x00007f6ee83ef53a in blink::LayoutBlock::ComputePreferredLogicalWidths (this=0x3dda8d4243d0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_block.cc:1509
 #9  0x00007f6ee8451f01 in blink::LayoutBox::MaxPreferredLogicalWidth (this=0x3dda8d4243d0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_box.cc:1395
 #10 0x00007f6ee84adba2 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::ComputeInnerFlexBaseSizeForChild (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    child=..., main_axis_border_and_padding=0px, child_layout_type=blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::kForceLayout)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:890
 #11 0x00007f6ee84ae5d1 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::ConstructAndAppendFlexItem (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    algorithm=0x7f6e7d42ed70, child=..., layout_type=blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::kForceLayout)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:1203
 #12 0x00007f6ee84aa27b in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::LayoutFlexItems (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    relayout_children=true, layout_scope=...)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:934
 #13 0x00007f6ee84a9cff in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::UpdateBlockLayout (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    relayout_children=true) at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:369

Bug: 1019138
Change-Id: Ie94e69a5f3fe6accc3623d358315b174088d5597
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1902514
Commit-Queue: David Grogan <[email protected]>
Auto-Submit: Christian Biesinger <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Grogan <[email protected]>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#713296}
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2019
…iner height

See stack trace below. We set the override container logical height to -1
for the initial layout of a flex item so that we compute the correct size
for min-height. However, that messes with our cache for definite heights
because we would always set it to indefinite in such a case.

Instead, just don't cache these values. That way we will later compute the right
thing for resolving flex-basis, etc.

(FlexNG can't come soon enough...)

 #0  blink::LayoutBox::ContainingBlockLogicalHeightForPercentageResolution (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    out_cb=0x7f6e7d42d8c0, out_skipped_auto_height_containing_block=0x0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_box.cc:3833
 #1  0x00007f6ee84ad0a1 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::MainAxisLengthIsDefinite (this=0x3dda8d434010,
    child=..., flex_basis=Length(0%, Percent), add_to_cb=false)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:762
 #2  0x00007f6ee84af930 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::MainSizeIsDefiniteForPercentageResolution (
    this=0x3dda8d434010, child=...)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:1125
 #3  0x00007f6ee84ad7f5 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::UseOverrideLogicalHeightForPerentageResolution (
    this=0x3dda8d434010, child=...)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:1137
 #4  0x00007f6ee83f2b9d in blink::LayoutBlock::AvailableLogicalHeightForPercentageComputation (
    this=0x3dda8d434198) at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_block.cc:2333
 #5  0x00007f6ee845e745 in blink::LayoutBox::ContainingBlockLogicalHeightForPercentageResolution (
    this=0x3dda8d4243d0, out_cb=0x0, out_skipped_auto_height_containing_block=0x0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_box.cc:3830
 #6  0x00007f6ee86dcc5c in blink::LayoutBoxUtils::AvailableLogicalHeight (box=..., cb=0x3dda8d434198)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/ng/layout_box_utils.cc:64
 #7  0x00007f6ee86eafea in blink::LayoutNGMixin<blink::LayoutBlockFlow>::ComputeIntrinsicLogicalWidths (
    this=0x3dda8d4243d0, min_logical_width=0px, max_logical_width=0px)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/ng/layout_ng_mixin.cc:48
 #8  0x00007f6ee83ef53a in blink::LayoutBlock::ComputePreferredLogicalWidths (this=0x3dda8d4243d0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_block.cc:1509
 #9  0x00007f6ee8451f01 in blink::LayoutBox::MaxPreferredLogicalWidth (this=0x3dda8d4243d0)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_box.cc:1395
 #10 0x00007f6ee84adba2 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::ComputeInnerFlexBaseSizeForChild (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    child=..., main_axis_border_and_padding=0px, child_layout_type=blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::kForceLayout)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:890
 #11 0x00007f6ee84ae5d1 in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::ConstructAndAppendFlexItem (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    algorithm=0x7f6e7d42ed70, child=..., layout_type=blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::kForceLayout)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:1203
 #12 0x00007f6ee84aa27b in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::LayoutFlexItems (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    relayout_children=true, layout_scope=...)
    at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:934
 #13 0x00007f6ee84a9cff in blink::LayoutFlexibleBox::UpdateBlockLayout (this=0x3dda8d434198,
    relayout_children=true) at ../../third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_flexible_box.cc:369

Bug: 1019138
Change-Id: Ie94e69a5f3fe6accc3623d358315b174088d5597
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1902514
Commit-Queue: David Grogan <[email protected]>
Auto-Submit: Christian Biesinger <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Grogan <[email protected]>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#713296}
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2023
This reverts commit 3438f2a59daa31ad1d86777d73e1cff836cef570.

Reason for revert: Suspect causing blink_wpt_tests and blink_web_tests faliure on Linux Tests (dbg)(1) bot.

Failed tests:
blink_wpt_tests failed because of:
external/wpt/css/css-contain/content-visibility/detach-locked-slot-children-crash.html
external/wpt/css/css-contain/content-visibility/element-reassigned-to-skipped-slot.html
external/wpt/css/css-contain/content-visibility/element-reassigned-to-slot-in-skipped-subtree.html
external/wpt/html/semantics/forms/the-input-element/focus-dynamic-type-change-on-blur.html
...7 more failure(s) (11 total)...

blink_web_tests failed because of:
accessibility/details-summary-crash.html
fast/events/drag-on-removed-slider-does-not-crash.html
fast/forms/range/range-type-change-onchange-2.html
html/details_summary/details-add-summary.html
...5 more failure(s) (9 total)...

First build failure:
https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/chromium/builders/ci/Linux%20Tests%20(dbg)(1)/114032/overview

Sample log:
---
STDERR: #6 0x7fc01bd0361d logging::CheckError::~CheckError()
STDERR: #7 0x7fbffd21d08a blink::FlatTreeTraversal::AssertPrecondition()
STDERR: #8 0x7fbffd21cfd5 blink::FlatTreeTraversal::Parent()
STDERR: #9 0x7fbffd3c2a45 blink::FlatTreeTraversal::AncestorsOf()
STDERR: #10 0x7fbffd3d410e blink::(anonymous namespace)::NearestLockedExclusiveAncestor()
STDERR: #11 0x7fbffd3d3d17 blink::DisplayLockUtilities::IsInUnlockedOrActivatableSubtree()
STDERR: #12 0x7fbfedfabc4b blink::DisplayLockUtilities::ShouldIgnoreNodeDueToDisplayLock()
STDERR: #13 0x7fbfedf8b61c blink::AXObject::ToString()
STDERR: #14 0x7fbfedf8eccc blink::AXObject::Detach()
STDERR: #15 0x7fbfedf512df blink::AXNodeObject::Detach()
STDERR: #16 0x7fbfedf2d6a5 blink::AXLayoutObject::Detach()
STDERR: #17 0x7fbfedfce51a blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #18 0x7fbfedfcd998 blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #19 0x7fbfedfcdd74 blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #20 0x7fbfedfce992 blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #21 0x7fbffe6d16be blink::LayoutObject::WillBeDestroyed()
---

Original change's description:
> [A11y] Reland targeted cached property invalidation
>
> Relands the following CLS:
> * Enhance performance by targeting value updates to specific nodes, commit 704633e6846e44b20c488a3eb98fa43c2c8e4591.
> * Don't queue anything for irrelevant attribute changes, commit 2c66a62ed62e601b7a81271e4be4f9e173ce9afc.
> * Add comment explaining call to UpdateStyleAndLayoutTreeForNode(), commit 73b9eed3b48bc8ce70de657672755f44a89e7358.
> * Ensure cached values not invalidated during the computation of them, commit 4d167a62cd13d5209ecefb664e3690ac955bc559.
> * Run a test with --force-renderer-accessibility that used to fail, commit cab7ecd829b24acf677e02f8f118085eaad7f799.
> * Simplify code to update cached focusable state, commit 79cb184e5dab5f6084ec78d485bd9496eaa0aaf8.
> * Simplify code that invalidates cached values on an AXObject, commit 6df79a50a55fe5cf99d2c50f7308e1236361b771.
>
> Fixed: 1446864, 1446550, 1434555, 1362758
> Change-Id: I16855bdcb746cb41387b69e1e97ab72ffc47e342
> Cq-Do-Not-Cancel-Tryjobs: true
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4545510
> Commit-Queue: Aaron Leventhal <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Jacques Newman <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Chris Harrelson <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Philip Rogers <[email protected]>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1157878}

Change-Id: Iefe59fe1933747346eda8827fd683f310d6cddb3
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2023
This reverts commit 3438f2a59daa31ad1d86777d73e1cff836cef570.

Reason for revert: Suspect causing blink_wpt_tests and blink_web_tests failure on Linux Tests (dbg)(1) bot.

Failed tests:
blink_wpt_tests failed because of:
external/wpt/css/css-contain/content-visibility/detach-locked-slot-children-crash.html
external/wpt/css/css-contain/content-visibility/element-reassigned-to-skipped-slot.html
external/wpt/css/css-contain/content-visibility/element-reassigned-to-slot-in-skipped-subtree.html
external/wpt/html/semantics/forms/the-input-element/focus-dynamic-type-change-on-blur.html
...7 more failure(s) (11 total)...

blink_web_tests failed because of:
accessibility/details-summary-crash.html
fast/events/drag-on-removed-slider-does-not-crash.html
fast/forms/range/range-type-change-onchange-2.html
html/details_summary/details-add-summary.html
...5 more failure(s) (9 total)...

First build failure:
https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/chromium/builders/ci/Linux%20Tests%20(dbg)(1)/114032/overview

Sample log:
---
STDERR: #6 0x7fc01bd0361d logging::CheckError::~CheckError()
STDERR: #7 0x7fbffd21d08a blink::FlatTreeTraversal::AssertPrecondition()
STDERR: #8 0x7fbffd21cfd5 blink::FlatTreeTraversal::Parent()
STDERR: #9 0x7fbffd3c2a45 blink::FlatTreeTraversal::AncestorsOf()
STDERR: #10 0x7fbffd3d410e blink::(anonymous namespace)::NearestLockedExclusiveAncestor()
STDERR: #11 0x7fbffd3d3d17 blink::DisplayLockUtilities::IsInUnlockedOrActivatableSubtree()
STDERR: #12 0x7fbfedfabc4b blink::DisplayLockUtilities::ShouldIgnoreNodeDueToDisplayLock()
STDERR: #13 0x7fbfedf8b61c blink::AXObject::ToString()
STDERR: #14 0x7fbfedf8eccc blink::AXObject::Detach()
STDERR: #15 0x7fbfedf512df blink::AXNodeObject::Detach()
STDERR: #16 0x7fbfedf2d6a5 blink::AXLayoutObject::Detach()
STDERR: #17 0x7fbfedfce51a blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #18 0x7fbfedfcd998 blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #19 0x7fbfedfcdd74 blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #20 0x7fbfedfce992 blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #21 0x7fbffe6d16be blink::LayoutObject::WillBeDestroyed()
---

Original change's description:
> [A11y] Reland targeted cached property invalidation
>
> Relands the following CLS:
> * Enhance performance by targeting value updates to specific nodes, commit 704633e6846e44b20c488a3eb98fa43c2c8e4591.
> * Don't queue anything for irrelevant attribute changes, commit 2c66a62ed62e601b7a81271e4be4f9e173ce9afc.
> * Add comment explaining call to UpdateStyleAndLayoutTreeForNode(), commit 73b9eed3b48bc8ce70de657672755f44a89e7358.
> * Ensure cached values not invalidated during the computation of them, commit 4d167a62cd13d5209ecefb664e3690ac955bc559.
> * Run a test with --force-renderer-accessibility that used to fail, commit cab7ecd829b24acf677e02f8f118085eaad7f799.
> * Simplify code to update cached focusable state, commit 79cb184e5dab5f6084ec78d485bd9496eaa0aaf8.
> * Simplify code that invalidates cached values on an AXObject, commit 6df79a50a55fe5cf99d2c50f7308e1236361b771.
>
> Fixed: 1446864, 1446550, 1434555, 1362758
> Change-Id: I16855bdcb746cb41387b69e1e97ab72ffc47e342
> Cq-Do-Not-Cancel-Tryjobs: true
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4545510
> Commit-Queue: Aaron Leventhal <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Jacques Newman <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Chris Harrelson <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Philip Rogers <[email protected]>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1157878}

Change-Id: Iefe59fe1933747346eda8827fd683f310d6cddb3
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2023
This reverts commit 3438f2a59daa31ad1d86777d73e1cff836cef570.

Reason for revert: Suspect causing blink_wpt_tests and blink_web_tests failure on Linux Tests (dbg)(1) bot.

Failed tests:
blink_wpt_tests failed because of:
external/wpt/css/css-contain/content-visibility/detach-locked-slot-children-crash.html
external/wpt/css/css-contain/content-visibility/element-reassigned-to-skipped-slot.html
external/wpt/css/css-contain/content-visibility/element-reassigned-to-slot-in-skipped-subtree.html
external/wpt/html/semantics/forms/the-input-element/focus-dynamic-type-change-on-blur.html
...7 more failure(s) (11 total)...

blink_web_tests failed because of:
accessibility/details-summary-crash.html
fast/events/drag-on-removed-slider-does-not-crash.html
fast/forms/range/range-type-change-onchange-2.html
html/details_summary/details-add-summary.html
...5 more failure(s) (9 total)...

First build failure:
https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/chromium/builders/ci/Linux%20Tests%20(dbg)(1)/114032/overview

Sample log:
---
STDERR: #6 0x7fc01bd0361d logging::CheckError::~CheckError()
STDERR: #7 0x7fbffd21d08a blink::FlatTreeTraversal::AssertPrecondition()
STDERR: #8 0x7fbffd21cfd5 blink::FlatTreeTraversal::Parent()
STDERR: #9 0x7fbffd3c2a45 blink::FlatTreeTraversal::AncestorsOf()
STDERR: #10 0x7fbffd3d410e blink::(anonymous namespace)::NearestLockedExclusiveAncestor()
STDERR: #11 0x7fbffd3d3d17 blink::DisplayLockUtilities::IsInUnlockedOrActivatableSubtree()
STDERR: #12 0x7fbfedfabc4b blink::DisplayLockUtilities::ShouldIgnoreNodeDueToDisplayLock()
STDERR: #13 0x7fbfedf8b61c blink::AXObject::ToString()
STDERR: #14 0x7fbfedf8eccc blink::AXObject::Detach()
STDERR: #15 0x7fbfedf512df blink::AXNodeObject::Detach()
STDERR: #16 0x7fbfedf2d6a5 blink::AXLayoutObject::Detach()
STDERR: #17 0x7fbfedfce51a blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #18 0x7fbfedfcd998 blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #19 0x7fbfedfcdd74 blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #20 0x7fbfedfce992 blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #21 0x7fbffe6d16be blink::LayoutObject::WillBeDestroyed()
---

Original change's description:
> [A11y] Reland targeted cached property invalidation
>
> Relands the following CLS:
> * Enhance performance by targeting value updates to specific nodes, commit 704633e6846e44b20c488a3eb98fa43c2c8e4591.
> * Don't queue anything for irrelevant attribute changes, commit 2c66a62ed62e601b7a81271e4be4f9e173ce9afc.
> * Add comment explaining call to UpdateStyleAndLayoutTreeForNode(), commit 73b9eed3b48bc8ce70de657672755f44a89e7358.
> * Ensure cached values not invalidated during the computation of them, commit 4d167a62cd13d5209ecefb664e3690ac955bc559.
> * Run a test with --force-renderer-accessibility that used to fail, commit cab7ecd829b24acf677e02f8f118085eaad7f799.
> * Simplify code to update cached focusable state, commit 79cb184e5dab5f6084ec78d485bd9496eaa0aaf8.
> * Simplify code that invalidates cached values on an AXObject, commit 6df79a50a55fe5cf99d2c50f7308e1236361b771.
>
> Fixed: 1446864, 1446550, 1434555, 1362758
> Change-Id: I16855bdcb746cb41387b69e1e97ab72ffc47e342
> Cq-Do-Not-Cancel-Tryjobs: true
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4545510
> Commit-Queue: Aaron Leventhal <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Jacques Newman <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Chris Harrelson <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Philip Rogers <[email protected]>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1157878}

Change-Id: Iefe59fe1933747346eda8827fd683f310d6cddb3
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4615927
Reviewed-by: Takuto Ikuta <[email protected]>
Owners-Override: Takuto Ikuta <[email protected]>
Commit-Queue: Takuto Ikuta <[email protected]>
Auto-Submit: Takashi Sakamoto <[email protected]>
Bot-Commit: Rubber Stamper <[email protected]>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1157993}
chromium-wpt-export-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2023
This reverts commit 3438f2a59daa31ad1d86777d73e1cff836cef570.

Reason for revert: Suspect causing blink_wpt_tests and blink_web_tests failure on Linux Tests (dbg)(1) bot.

Failed tests:
blink_wpt_tests failed because of:
external/wpt/css/css-contain/content-visibility/detach-locked-slot-children-crash.html
external/wpt/css/css-contain/content-visibility/element-reassigned-to-skipped-slot.html
external/wpt/css/css-contain/content-visibility/element-reassigned-to-slot-in-skipped-subtree.html
external/wpt/html/semantics/forms/the-input-element/focus-dynamic-type-change-on-blur.html
...7 more failure(s) (11 total)...

blink_web_tests failed because of:
accessibility/details-summary-crash.html
fast/events/drag-on-removed-slider-does-not-crash.html
fast/forms/range/range-type-change-onchange-2.html
html/details_summary/details-add-summary.html
...5 more failure(s) (9 total)...

First build failure:
https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/chromium/builders/ci/Linux%20Tests%20(dbg)(1)/114032/overview

Sample log:
---
STDERR: #6 0x7fc01bd0361d logging::CheckError::~CheckError()
STDERR: #7 0x7fbffd21d08a blink::FlatTreeTraversal::AssertPrecondition()
STDERR: #8 0x7fbffd21cfd5 blink::FlatTreeTraversal::Parent()
STDERR: #9 0x7fbffd3c2a45 blink::FlatTreeTraversal::AncestorsOf()
STDERR: #10 0x7fbffd3d410e blink::(anonymous namespace)::NearestLockedExclusiveAncestor()
STDERR: #11 0x7fbffd3d3d17 blink::DisplayLockUtilities::IsInUnlockedOrActivatableSubtree()
STDERR: #12 0x7fbfedfabc4b blink::DisplayLockUtilities::ShouldIgnoreNodeDueToDisplayLock()
STDERR: #13 0x7fbfedf8b61c blink::AXObject::ToString()
STDERR: #14 0x7fbfedf8eccc blink::AXObject::Detach()
STDERR: #15 0x7fbfedf512df blink::AXNodeObject::Detach()
STDERR: #16 0x7fbfedf2d6a5 blink::AXLayoutObject::Detach()
STDERR: #17 0x7fbfedfce51a blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #18 0x7fbfedfcd998 blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #19 0x7fbfedfcdd74 blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #20 0x7fbfedfce992 blink::AXObjectCacheImpl::Remove()
STDERR: #21 0x7fbffe6d16be blink::LayoutObject::WillBeDestroyed()
---

Original change's description:
> [A11y] Reland targeted cached property invalidation
>
> Relands the following CLS:
> * Enhance performance by targeting value updates to specific nodes, commit 704633e6846e44b20c488a3eb98fa43c2c8e4591.
> * Don't queue anything for irrelevant attribute changes, commit 2c66a62ed62e601b7a81271e4be4f9e173ce9afc.
> * Add comment explaining call to UpdateStyleAndLayoutTreeForNode(), commit 73b9eed3b48bc8ce70de657672755f44a89e7358.
> * Ensure cached values not invalidated during the computation of them, commit 4d167a62cd13d5209ecefb664e3690ac955bc559.
> * Run a test with --force-renderer-accessibility that used to fail, commit cab7ecd829b24acf677e02f8f118085eaad7f799.
> * Simplify code to update cached focusable state, commit 79cb184e5dab5f6084ec78d485bd9496eaa0aaf8.
> * Simplify code that invalidates cached values on an AXObject, commit 6df79a50a55fe5cf99d2c50f7308e1236361b771.
>
> Fixed: 1446864, 1446550, 1434555, 1362758
> Change-Id: I16855bdcb746cb41387b69e1e97ab72ffc47e342
> Cq-Do-Not-Cancel-Tryjobs: true
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4545510
> Commit-Queue: Aaron Leventhal <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Jacques Newman <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Chris Harrelson <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Philip Rogers <[email protected]>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1157878}

Change-Id: Iefe59fe1933747346eda8827fd683f310d6cddb3
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4615927
Reviewed-by: Takuto Ikuta <[email protected]>
Owners-Override: Takuto Ikuta <[email protected]>
Commit-Queue: Takuto Ikuta <[email protected]>
Auto-Submit: Takashi Sakamoto <[email protected]>
Bot-Commit: Rubber Stamper <[email protected]>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1157993}
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants