Expand on Snowfork content on Bridge Hub page #6167
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
CrackTheCode016
added
A2 - Please Review
|
Left it pretty simple, mostly pointing towards Snowbridge's documentation and summarizing its features. |
filippoweb3
approved these changes
Aug 28, 2024
| @@ -25,6 +29,11 @@ A two-way trustless bridge between chains A and B can be viewed as two one-way b | |||
| source and a target chain. Any bridge operating on the Bridge Hub will have on-chain (pallets) and | |||
| offchain (relayers) components. | |||
|
|
|||
| Examples of trustless on Bridge Hub include: | |||
|
|
|||
| - Snowfork, a decentralized bridge between Polkadot and Ethereum | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
should we specify that this is an Ethereum light client on Polkadot that syncs to Ethereum and keeps the Ethereum state up-to-date on Polkadot?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe this is good for the next PR, we can add those details in the followup 👍
DrW3RK
approved these changes
Aug 28, 2024
|
|
||
| Trustlessness here is defined in the sense that the users do not need to trust any particular | ||
| individuals or organizations, but rather only the mathematics, code, cryptography, and protocol. An | ||
| example of a system which implies a high level of trust **trust** would be that of a bridge which is |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| example of a system which implies a high level of trust **trust** would be that of a bridge which is | |
| example of a system which implies a high level of **trust** would be that of a bridge, which is |
Good point, I was not sure whether I should go in more detail about the message passing and its architecture, I agree we can add in a separate PR. |
Co-authored-by: Filippo <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Radha <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Radha <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Radha <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Radha <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Radha <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Radha <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Radha <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Addresses mega issue #6085
Expand on Snowfork content on Bridge Hub page