-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add preliminary apk-proofs spec #625
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
||
[#sect-grandpa-apk-proof] | ||
=== Ultralight Finality Proof | ||
A plokadot APK prover node is responsible to generate succinct proof for aggregated validator public keys who has signed a particular BEEFY message in form of a SNARK. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
APK = aggregate public key
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Misspells
|
||
[#sect-grandpa-apk-proof] | ||
=== Ultralight Finality Proof | ||
A plokadot APK prover node is responsible to generate succinct proof for aggregated validator public keys who has signed a particular BEEFY message in form of a SNARK. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A plokadot APK prover node is responsible to generate succinct proof for aggregated validator public keys who has signed a particular BEEFY message in form of a SNARK. | |
A Polkadot APK prover node is responsible to generate succinct proof for aggregated validator public keys who has signed a particular BEEFY message in form of a SNARK. |
|
||
In light client protocols, such commitment is used to commit to the | ||
upcoming validator set, signed by the current validator set. Honest | ||
validator should check the proofs of possession of each public key |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
validator should check the proofs of possession of each public key | |
validators should check the proofs of possession of each public key |
===== Prover | ||
|
||
Prover is responsible to generate APK proofs. The `Prover` struct | ||
encapsultes this task. It contains the following fields: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
encapsultes this task. It contains the following fields: | |
encapsulates this task. It contains the following fields: |
encapsultes this task. It contains the following fields: | ||
|
||
* `Domains`: ??? | ||
* `Keyset`: set of all committe public keys (?) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
* `Keyset`: set of all committe public keys (?) | |
* `Keyset`: set of all committee public keys (?) |
APK proofs are SNARK based proof protocols to enable verification of | ||
aggregated BLS signatures without the knowledge of individual public | ||
keys of all the signers. APK proofs uses its own custom SNARK. The | ||
protocol is implemented in two flavours: link:#BW6[BW6] and |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just for the checks, technically both terms are correct ;)
protocol is implemented in two flavours: link:#BW6[BW6] and | |
protocol is implemented in two flavors: link:#BW6[BW6] and |
This is a mainly a draft but I needed some proper way of compling the latex stuff to make sure they are correct, so I added it to the spec so I can compile the math.