Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HTML horizontal review: Agent clusters #450

Closed
3 tasks done
hober opened this issue Dec 10, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed
3 tasks done

HTML horizontal review: Agent clusters #450

hober opened this issue Dec 10, 2019 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
htmlwg-needs-resolution htmlwg-tracker Progress: review complete Resolution: satisfied The TAG is satisfied with this design Review type: horizontal review A review request from a WG seeking horizontal review to transition a document along the REC track Review type: later review Topic: HTML Topic: scripting ECMA, Web Assembly bindings, etc. Venue: WHATWG

Comments

@hober
Copy link
Contributor

hober commented Dec 10, 2019

Subtask of #412.

PRs to review:

@hober hober added Topic: HTML Progress: untriaged Topic: scripting ECMA, Web Assembly bindings, etc. Review type: horizontal review A review request from a WG seeking horizontal review to transition a document along the REC track htmlwg-tracker htmlwg-needs-resolution labels Dec 10, 2019
@hober
Copy link
Contributor Author

hober commented Mar 2, 2020

@kenchris and I looked at these in our Wellington F2F; this is a nice, clean change that makes most of this text easier to understand. No architectural issues noted.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
htmlwg-needs-resolution htmlwg-tracker Progress: review complete Resolution: satisfied The TAG is satisfied with this design Review type: horizontal review A review request from a WG seeking horizontal review to transition a document along the REC track Review type: later review Topic: HTML Topic: scripting ECMA, Web Assembly bindings, etc. Venue: WHATWG
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants