Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prioritize outgoing datagrams over stream data #340

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 1, 2021

Conversation

yutakahirano
Copy link
Contributor

@yutakahirano yutakahirano commented Aug 31, 2021

Discussed at #62. Explicitly state that outgoing datagrams are
prioritized for now. We will introduce a way to change this
default behavior, as part of the prioritization API.


Preview | Diff

@yutakahirano
Copy link
Contributor Author

PTAL. If this looks good I'll change the milestone of #62.

Discussed at #62. Explicitly state that outgoing datagrams are
prioritized for now. We will introduce a way to change this
default behavior, as part of the prioritization API.
@yutakahirano yutakahirano force-pushed the yhirano/datagram-stream-priority branch from 502446f to 4122fe6 Compare August 31, 2021 11:10
@yutakahirano
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vasilvv can you take a look? Is this aligned with what we're doing in Chrome?

@vasilvv
Copy link
Contributor

vasilvv commented Aug 31, 2021

The actual logic of what we're doing is actually really complicated (since it has to account for retransmissions, control frames, etc), but as an approximation, this is correct.

@yutakahirano
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you!

@yutakahirano yutakahirano merged commit 5bf0bba into main Sep 1, 2021
@yutakahirano yutakahirano deleted the yhirano/datagram-stream-priority branch September 1, 2021 01:36
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2021
SHA: 5bf0bba
Reason: push, by @yutakahirano

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants