Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add getKeys() proposal #649

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 4, 2024
Merged

Add getKeys() proposal #649

merged 4 commits into from
Jul 4, 2024

Conversation

oliverdunk
Copy link
Member

Proposal for the getKeys() method from #601, originally proposed by @polywock.

I am planning to implement this in Chromium as part of some work on the browser.storage API.

Copy link
Member Author

@oliverdunk oliverdunk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for doing a pass @xeenon, added some replies to your comments.

proposals/storage-get-keys.md Show resolved Hide resolved
proposals/storage-get-keys.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
proposals/storage-get-keys.md Show resolved Hide resolved
proposals/storage-get-keys.md Show resolved Hide resolved
proposals/storage-get-keys.md Show resolved Hide resolved
proposals/storage-get-keys.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
proposals/storage-get-keys.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
proposals/storage-get-keys.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@oliverdunk oliverdunk merged commit ef9750b into w3c:main Jul 4, 2024
3 checks passed
@oliverdunk oliverdunk deleted the storage-get-keys branch July 4, 2024 16:36
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2024
SHA: ef9750b
Reason: push, by oliverdunk

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2024
SHA: ef9750b
Reason: push, by oliverdunk

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

There is developer interest for this API in
[#601](https://github.com/w3c/webextensions/issues/601). While we don't expect
significant immediate usage, it is a small, well-scoped API and should not

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wow

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants