You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Should concrete shape/object roles like circle have a more specific role description?
Currently they all map to graphic-image, which would have it's role description spoken as "image" rather than a more specific (perhaps meaningful) shape name as the role description, like "circle" or "rectangle"… As an example, these shapes are sometimes meaningful for flowcharts, and that de facto shape usage would be lost if they were all called "image."
Note: the accessibility of the flowchart use case is mainly blocked by the fact the SVG Working Group never shipped Connectors, so maybe this is not a pressing matter.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Should concrete shape/object roles like
circle
have a more specific role description?Currently they all map to graphic-image, which would have it's role description spoken as "image" rather than a more specific (perhaps meaningful) shape name as the role description, like "circle" or "rectangle"… As an example, these shapes are sometimes meaningful for flowcharts, and that de facto shape usage would be lost if they were all called "image."
Note: the accessibility of the flowchart use case is mainly blocked by the fact the SVG Working Group never shipped Connectors, so maybe this is not a pressing matter.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: