Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should concrete shape/object roles like circle have a more specific role description? #30

Open
Tracked by #69
cookiecrook opened this issue Nov 15, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@cookiecrook
Copy link

cookiecrook commented Nov 15, 2023

Should concrete shape/object roles like circle have a more specific role description?

Currently they all map to graphic-image, which would have it's role description spoken as "image" rather than a more specific (perhaps meaningful) shape name as the role description, like "circle" or "rectangle"… As an example, these shapes are sometimes meaningful for flowcharts, and that de facto shape usage would be lost if they were all called "image."

Note: the accessibility of the flowchart use case is mainly blocked by the fact the SVG Working Group never shipped Connectors, so maybe this is not a pressing matter.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant