Update references to RFC9110 #24
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ReSpec and Specref now use the `https://httpwg.org/specs/` version for RFC9110, as it is more readable. Unfortunately, the fragment identifiers are not the same in that version and need to be updated.
domel
approved these changes
Nov 24, 2023
rubensworks
approved these changes
Nov 30, 2023
pfps
added
the
spec:editorial
pfps
approved these changes
Dec 14, 2023
|
Telecon 2023-12-14 : the WG agreed to merge this. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
ReSpec and Specref now use the
https://httpwg.org/specs/version for RFC9110, as it is more readable. Unfortunately, the fragment identifiers are not the same in that version and need to be updated.Preview | Diff