Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relax the criteria for short-circuit #885

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 10, 2024
Merged

Relax the criteria for short-circuit #885

merged 5 commits into from
Jul 10, 2024

Conversation

frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator

@frivoal frivoal commented Jun 18, 2024

A high bar for support remains needed, and any dissent remains sufficient to defeat the short-circuit proposal, but unanimity is no longer required.

See #852


Preview | Diff

A high bar for support remains needed, and any dissent remains sufficient to
defeat the short-circuit proposal, but unanimity is no longer required.

See w3c#852
@frivoal frivoal added Type: Enhancement Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call Director-free: FO/Council Issues realted to the W3C Council and Formal Objection Handling AB Decision Closing this issue was done with an explicit AB decision labels Jun 18, 2024
@frivoal frivoal added this to the Process 2024 milestone Jun 18, 2024
@frivoal frivoal self-assigned this Jun 18, 2024
Copy link
Member

@TallTed TallTed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hopefully clarifying language tweak

index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
frivoal and others added 2 commits June 22, 2024 19:00
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
Copy link
Collaborator

@fantasai fantasai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The intention was to reduce the threshold to allow people to be absent (e.g. on vacation or whatever), not to introduce the option of abstaining, so I think we shouldn't say that it's possible.

index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@frivoal frivoal added Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion and removed Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call labels Jul 10, 2024
@frivoal frivoal merged commit 3fdc15a into w3c:main Jul 10, 2024
2 checks passed
@frivoal frivoal deleted the short branch July 10, 2024 15:33
Copy link
Member

@tantek tantek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AB Decision Closing this issue was done with an explicit AB decision Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion Director-free: FO/Council Issues realted to the W3C Council and Formal Objection Handling Type: Enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants