-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 132
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adjust AC appeal vote threshold based on participation #886
Labels
AB Decision
Closing this issue was done with an explicit AB decision
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Type: Enhancement
Milestone
Comments
frivoal
added
Type: Enhancement
Agenda+
Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call
labels
Jun 18, 2024
frivoal
added a commit
to frivoal/w3process
that referenced
this issue
Jun 18, 2024
This mirrors the "requisite member vote" process from the W3C bylaws, and avoids making momentous decisions based on a slim majority in vote with low participation. See w3c#886
frivoal
added a commit
to frivoal/w3process
that referenced
this issue
Jun 29, 2024
This mirrors the "requisite member vote" process from the W3C bylaws, and avoids making momentous decisions based on a slim majority in vote with low participation. See w3c#886
frivoal
added a commit
to frivoal/w3process
that referenced
this issue
Jun 29, 2024
This mirrors the "requisite member vote" process from the W3C bylaws, and avoids making momentous decisions based on a slim majority in vote with low participation. See w3c#886
frivoal
added a commit
to frivoal/w3process
that referenced
this issue
Jul 11, 2024
This mirrors the "requisite member vote" process from the W3C bylaws, and avoids making momentous decisions based on a slim majority in vote with low participation. See w3c#886
This would look something like this: 7bc5058 |
frivoal
added a commit
to frivoal/w3process
that referenced
this issue
Jul 16, 2024
frivoal
added a commit
to frivoal/w3process
that referenced
this issue
Jul 16, 2024
This mirrors the "requisite member vote" process from the W3C bylaws, and avoids making momentous decisions based on a slim majority in vote with low participation. Also includes a minimum quorum. See https://www.w3.org/2024/07/15-ab-minutes.html#r02 See w3c#886
frivoal
added
the
AB Decision
Closing this issue was done with an explicit AB decision
label
Jul 16, 2024
From the AB:
|
frivoal
added a commit
to frivoal/w3process
that referenced
this issue
Jul 16, 2024
This mirrors the "requisite member vote" process from the W3C bylaws, and avoids making momentous decisions based on a slim majority in vote with low participation. Also includes a minimum quorum. See https://www.w3.org/2024/07/15-ab-minutes.html#r02 See w3c#886
frivoal
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 24, 2024
This mirrors the "requisite member vote" process from the W3C bylaws, and avoids making momentous decisions based on a slim majority in vote with low participation. Also includes a minimum quorum. See https://www.w3.org/2024/07/15-ab-minutes.html#r02 See #886 Co-authored-by: Chris Needham <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
frivoal
added
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
and removed
Agenda+
Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call
labels
Jul 24, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
AB Decision
Closing this issue was done with an explicit AB decision
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Type: Enhancement
(Split from #882).
To avoid making momentous decisions based on a slim majority in vote with low participation, the W3C's bylaws have provisions for what they call "Requisite Member Vote" where decisions are confirmed by :
I think it would be reasonable to adopt the same concept for AC appeals, which currently can overturn decisions via a 50% majority without quorum or any other consideration for the level of participation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: