Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add reference to Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct (CEPC) in the Process Document #30

Closed
dwsinger opened this issue Apr 21, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

Add reference to Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct (CEPC) in the Process Document #30

dwsinger opened this issue Apr 21, 2017 · 5 comments
Assignees
@chaals
Labels
Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion DoC This has been referenced from a Disposition of Comments (or predates the use of DoCs)
Milestone
Process 2018

Comments

@dwsinger
Copy link
Contributor

Transferred from https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/178
State: Raised
@chaals chaals self-assigned this Apr 22, 2017
@chaals
Copy link
Contributor

chaals commented May 9, 2017

From the old issue:

We should have a reference to the Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct (CEPC)
https://www.w3.org/Consortium/cepc/ in the Process Document. Perhaps in 3.1 Individual participation critieria, "Participants must abide by W3C's Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct [CEPC]."

It's there. Closing

@chaals chaals closed this as completed May 9, 2017
@dwsinger
Copy link
Contributor Author

dwsinger commented May 9, 2017 via email

@dwsinger dwsinger mentioned this issue Jun 14, 2017
Closed
@chaals
Copy link
Contributor

chaals commented Jun 14, 2017

Clarify that among the requirements for participation is a specific requirement to abide by the terms of CEPC... Which becomes a substantive change.

@chaals chaals reopened this Jun 14, 2017
@dwsinger
Copy link
Contributor Author

We probably want to say that participants in any activity of the W3C must abide by the CEPC, which means we don't have to enumerate WGs, elected Gs like AB and TAG, AC, IGs, CGs, BGs, or even gee-gees.

chaals added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 12, 2017
@chaals
Normatively require adherence to CEPC
21839b2 
fix #30

Note that this change also requires adherence to the Patent Policy - please feel free to make a review comment
@chaals chaals mentioned this issue Jul 12, 2017
Closed
@chaals chaals closed this as completed in 968b5ee Aug 29, 2017
chaals added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 29, 2017
@chaals
Merge pull request #40 from w3c/chaals-17-chairs-cant-dismiss-TAG-AB
5af193f 
Fix #23 
Fix #30

* Director can suspend or remove participants, including in TAG/AB, for failure to meet participation criteria
* Participation criteria include adherence to terms and spirit of CEPC
* Chairs of AB/TAG can no longer remove particapants just by asking them to resign.
@vfournier17
Copy link

I agree with making this a normative requirement, otherwise it's not legally enforceable.

@frivoal frivoal added Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion DoC This has been referenced from a Disposition of Comments (or predates the use of DoCs) labels Dec 9, 2018
@frivoal frivoal added this to the Process 2018 milestone Feb 19, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@chaals chaals

Labels
Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion DoC This has been referenced from a Disposition of Comments (or predates the use of DoCs)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Process 2018
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@frivoal @chaals @dwsinger @vfournier17