Editorial cleanup regarding normative dependencies of the Process (#711)

Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>

index.bs

@@ -109,20 +109,21 @@ g g:hover text {
 <!--[if lt IE 9]><script src='undefined://www.w3.org/2008/site/js/html5shiv.js'></script><![endif]-->
 
 <h2 class="no-num no-toc no-ref" id="pp">
-Relation of Process Document to Patent Policy</h2>
+Relation of Process Document to Patent Policy and Other Policies</h2>
 
-	<!-- DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION OR ITS REFERNCE TO THE PATENT POLICY WITHOUT DISCUSSING WITH PSIG / COUNSEL. -->
+	<!-- DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION OR ITS REFERENCE TO THE PATENT POLICY WITHOUT DISCUSSING WITH PSIG / COUNSEL. -->
 
 	W3C Members' attention is called to the fact
 	that provisions of the Process Document are binding on Members
 	per the <a href="https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Agreement/Member-Agreement">Membership Agreement</a> [[MEMBER-AGREEMENT]].
 	The <a href="https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy/">W3C Patent Policy</a> [[!PATENT-POLICY]]
-	is incorporated by normative reference as a part of the Process Document,
-	and is thus equally binding.
+	and other policies
+	incorporated by normative reference as a part of the Process Document
+	are equally binding.
 
-	The Patent Policy places additional obligations on Members, Team, and other participants in W3C.
+	The Patent Policy and CEPC place additional obligations on Members, Team, and other participants in W3C.
 	The Process Document does not restate those requirements but includes references to them.
-	The Process Document and Patent Policy have been designed to allow them to evolve independently.
+	The Process Document, Patent Policy, and CEPC have been designed to allow each to evolve independently.
 
 	In the Process Document, the term “participant” refers to an individual, not an organization.