WD for PL2.0

[LJWatson]

It would be good to get an updated Working Draft (WD) published. Any blockers for this?

[scheib]

There is only one notable update to the editor's draft from the last working draft. That is a formatting change to the IDL blocks. There are outstanding issues which need to be applied to editor's draft. One is ready to go. Two are waiting to be determined.

Until a normative change is made I don't think a working draft is warranted.

[LJWatson]

Understood. Feel free to close this issue unless it's a useful place to discuss this when the time is right.

[LJWatson]

It's been more than 12 months since the FPWD. We should get an updated WD out, even if it only has editorial differences. @ylafon is this something you can do?

[ylafon]

Sure, or maybe setting up automatic publishing would be better, no?

[chaals]

@ylafon

maybe setting up automatic publishing would be better

For something where nothing serious has changed in 12 months,. no. A Working Draft should note3 the stability and explain it, e.g. in SOTD, as per Process. Otherwise it is no improvement on a draft that is dated a year or more ago.

[LJWatson]

The two are not mutually exclusive. Let's include a note in the updated WD as @chaals notes, then use auto-publish going forward.

[mustaqahmed]

We don't have any distinction between the WD and the editor's draft, right? As of today, both are dated "17 June 2024".