Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Complete <ruby> related mappings #115

Closed
jasonkiss opened this issue Jan 22, 2018 · 3 comments · Fixed by #253
Closed

Complete <ruby> related mappings #115

jasonkiss opened this issue Jan 22, 2018 · 3 comments · Fixed by #253
Labels
question

Comments

@jasonkiss
Copy link
Contributor

Need to add entries for rb and rtc.

Note that AX has some roles/subroles for ruby and associated elements. See related webkit bug.

Not sure if/how these elements are being dealt with in other browsers/APIs.
@jasonkiss jasonkiss added the AAM label Jan 22, 2018
@jasonkiss jasonkiss added AAM V2 and removed AAM labels Feb 7, 2018
@jasonkiss
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've added the rows to the mapping table, and completed the AXAPI mappings as best as I can determine.

Now we need input for MSAA+IA2, UIA, and ATK.

Moving to AAM v2.

jasonkiss added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 7, 2018
@jasonkiss
some updates to ruby elements / issue #115
386c231
@scottaohara
Copy link
Member

As rb and rtc are not part of the HTML Living Standard, should they be:

  1. removed re: menuitem Remove/update menuitems and menu #188
  2. have a comment adding that these elements are not part of the HTML specification

@stevefaulkner ^

@scottaohara
Copy link
Member

scottaohara commented Jul 27, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Related discussion about marking at risk from HTML 5.3.

FWIW, I'm personally leaning more towards adding a comment for now, it seems we should remove them (at least until consensus is reached) as they are outliers in that we don't map other elements/attributes marked as obsolete.

scottaohara added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 22, 2019
@scottaohara
comment out rb and rtc
8ec3952 
closes #115

While this PR fills in mappings for `rb` and the `rtc` elements based on how they are presently mapped, they are also being commented out as they are marked as obsolete in the HTML specification.

If consensus can be reached on adding these elements back into the HTML specification, then this PR should be reversed.
@scottaohara scottaohara mentioned this issue Sep 22, 2019
Merged
stevefaulkner pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 6, 2019
@scottaohara @stevefaulkner
Removal of obsolete elements RB and RTC (#253)
9bacd31 
* comment out rb and rtc

closes #115

While this PR fills in mappings for `rb` and the `rtc` elements based on how they are presently mapped, they are also being commented out as they are marked as obsolete in the HTML specification.

If consensus can be reached on adding these elements back into the HTML specification, then this PR should be reversed.

* Update index.html
@scottaohara scottaohara mentioned this issue Feb 12, 2020
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
question
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Removal of obsolete elements RB and RTC w3c/html-aam
2 participants
@jasonkiss @scottaohara