MathML Working Group Draft Charter #295
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Reworded parts that use the word "semantics" to avoid confusion over what is being done in MathML 4.
Filled in initial guesses for dates Tweaked 'other deliverables'
…ore flexibility in case we do something different.
iherman
reviewed
Nov 10, 2020
|
|
||
| <dt><a href="https://www.w3.org/publishing/groups/publ-wg/">Publishing Working Group</a></dt> | ||
| <dd>The Publishing Working Group's goal is to enable all publications to be first class citizens of the web. MathML is used by a large number of technical and textbook publishers in their workflows. The MathML WG will work with the PWG to ensure their needs are met with updates to the MathML recommendations.</dd> | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Several comments on this one:
- the Publishing Working Group (renamed Audiobooks Working Group) is now in maintenance mode with a different scope. I am not sure it is worth listing it here.
- instead, I would propose to add the EPUB Working Group to the lot (https://www.w3.org/publishing/groups/epub-wg/). MathML is of a vital importance for the digital publishing world in general, and EPUB in particular. I would actually think it would be useful to have some sort of an active relationship (try to have common WG members, etc) to ensure an active cooperation.
- I would also add the Publishing Community Group (https://www.w3.org/community/publishingcg/) to the list; that group, as a CG, does not have a strong charter control over its work, and is looking at digital publishing issues at large. MathML is a major consideration for that CG as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Dropping the (now) AudioBooks WG from the groups we will coordinate with and adding the EPUB WG makes a lot of sense. I've fielded a number of questions and comments from them in the past, so I have first hand experience they are interested in what we are doing. Adding the Publishing CG is also sensible. So +1 to @iherman's suggestions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@NSoiffer thanks.
Note that this branch has been merged, so the file is edited elsewhere now... I am not sure how that will be handled.
|
Merging for review |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The MathML Refresh CG has developed a charter for a restart of the Math Working Group. We believe this is now ready for W3C review.