Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update rfc9110 and rfc9111 to use section references. #144

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 20, 2023
Merged

Conversation

garretrieger
Copy link
Contributor

@garretrieger garretrieger commented Apr 12, 2023

Bikeshed no longer supports the section name references. See: #143.


Preview | Diff

Bikeshed no longer supports the section name references. See: #143.
@garretrieger garretrieger requested a review from svgeesus April 12, 2023 20:10
@svgeesus svgeesus merged commit a656c4c into main Apr 20, 2023
@svgeesus svgeesus deleted the refs branch April 20, 2023 10:32
tidoust added a commit to tidoust/IFT that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2023
We eventually switched to the `https://httpwg.org/specs/` versions for RFC9110,
RFC9111 and RFC9112 in the cross-references database, because they are more
readable.

Unfortunately, this means that references to sections in these specs need to be
updated again, as was done in w3c#144. This update uses the new (and in theory now
stable) fragment identifiers.
garretrieger pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2023
We eventually switched to the `https://httpwg.org/specs/` versions for RFC9110,
RFC9111 and RFC9112 in the cross-references database, because they are more
readable.

Unfortunately, this means that references to sections in these specs need to be
updated again, as was done in #144. This update uses the new (and in theory now
stable) fragment identifiers.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants