Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat[docs]: add bug bounty program to security policy #4230

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 10, 2024

Conversation

cyberthirst
Copy link
Collaborator

What I did

How I did it

How to verify it

Commit message

Commit message for the final, squashed PR. (Optional, but reviewers will appreciate it! Please see our commit message style guide for what we would ideally like to see in a commit message.)

Description for the changelog

Cute Animal Picture

Put a link to a cute animal picture inside the parenthesis-->

@charles-cooper charles-cooper changed the title feat[docs]: include bpp in security policy feat[docs]: include bug bounty program in security policy Sep 9, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@pcaversaccio pcaversaccio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some nit comments; overall good to go IMO.

SECURITY.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
SECURITY.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
SECURITY.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
SECURITY.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
- If a compiler bug affects production code, it is in scope.
- This includes bugs in older compiler versions still used in production (excluding known issues).
- If a compiler bug does not currently affect production but is likely to in the future, it is in scope.
- This mainly applies to the latest compiler release (e.g., a new release is available but contracts are not yet deployed with it).
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

there might be questions re what "new" exactly means (like 2 weeks, 6 months etc.). But we can address this if someone challenges it.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I agree, but it was intentional. I think it's realistic that 0.3.10 might be used, but how far into the past should we go? I leave it up to the hunters to convince us / ask further questions.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think 0.3.7 has been used widely but we shouldn't overthink it too much indeed.

SECURITY.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cyberthirst and others added 2 commits September 9, 2024 19:32
Co-authored-by: sudo rm -rf --no-preserve-root / <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: sudo rm -rf --no-preserve-root / <[email protected]>
SECURITY.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@charles-cooper charles-cooper changed the title feat[docs]: include bug bounty program in security policy feat[docs]: add bug bounty program to security policy Sep 10, 2024
@charles-cooper charles-cooper merged commit 5a7b481 into vyperlang:master Sep 10, 2024
156 checks passed
charles-cooper pushed a commit to charles-cooper/vyper that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2024
---------

Co-authored-by: sudo rm -rf --no-preserve-root / <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants