Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

wip - reorder commutative ops #3952

Closed

Conversation

charles-cooper
Copy link
Member

What I did

try reordering commutative ops in the dft. not sure if this approach really works.

How I did it

How to verify it

Commit message

Commit message for the final, squashed PR. (Optional, but reviewers will appreciate it! Please see our commit message style guide for what we would ideally like to see in a commit message.)

Description for the changelog

Cute Animal Picture

Put a link to a cute animal picture inside the parenthesis-->

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Apr 14, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.26%. Comparing base (f4c9946) to head (786ca45).

Current head 786ca45 differs from pull request most recent head 402a111

Please upload reports for the commit 402a111 to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3952      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.48%   89.26%   -1.23%     
==========================================
  Files         106       95      -11     
  Lines       15306    14454     -852     
  Branches     3368     3206     -162     
==========================================
- Hits        13850    12902     -948     
- Misses       1001     1097      +96     
  Partials      455      455              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@charles-cooper
Copy link
Member Author

superseded by #4358

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants