Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: Nuxt 2 --> 3 #2766
docs: Nuxt 2 --> 3 #2766
Changes from 1 commit
7650f2f
986636a
1847d7d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is still problematic because of teh usage of
useNuxtApp()
. So maybe, adapting the example to something else where the context is not available and this is needed, is better. Or maybe, specify that the example below is Nuxt 2There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the whole of Nuxt 3 is a place “where the context is not available”, until you call useNuxtApp(), which is the Nuxt 3 equivalent of context https://nuxt.com/docs/guide/going-further/nuxt-app (eta I fixed that link)
So I think whenever a pinia store is used outside of a setup, it’s necessary to have passed it the pinia instance found on the Nuxt app instance - right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Then maybe this is just not longer needed, only in some more convoluted examples like lazy invocation in a plugin
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there someone we can ask? It seems important to clarify, since I read elsewhere in the documentation that
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The existence of the tip implies to me that the module isn’t automatically passing the pinia instance to the store, except in the setup function.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you are already asking the right person 😅
These parts of the docs could be updated. The different is a little bit more subtle, as it works now inside navigation guards and other parts of the application since
app.runWithContext()
. The nuxt function also follows this rule BTW. Feel free to give this a try if you wantThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. I'm just very confused about all of this. The existing documentation made me believe I needed to do something to prevent Cross-Request State Pollution when using a pinia store inside an
onMounted
callback. I'm not sure if you are saying that's true or false, or how one can do it in Nuxt 3 (given you say the use ofuseNuxtApp()
is problematic).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't call
useStore()
within onMounted, just call it outside, and consume the store withinonMounted()
.You cannot useNuxtApp() anywhere (as stated in the docs), only in places where there is Vue injection context (a rather implicit concept), in other words, within setup and composables and other explictely mentioned places (because they are injection context aware) like stores, middleware, plugins, etc
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That is what my example / diff does. I call useStore (and useNuxtApp) in the setup function, and store.doAction() in the onMounted().
I don't believe I have enough context about Nuxt and Vue to be able to help complete this documentation, but I thank you for your kind responses.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, you don't need to pass the pinia instance within setup. I assumed the code sample was outside of
setup()
and thatonMounted()
was a mistake there. I will rework the example when I can but anybody should feel free to give it a try