Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

only coerce values when schema is provided #5384

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ritch
Copy link
Contributor

@ritch ritch commented Jan 14, 2025

This fixes a new implicit value coercion that was recently added.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved error handling in schema value coercion process
    • Added a safety check to prevent processing when schema is not provided

The changes ensure more robust handling of value transformations, protecting against potential undefined schema scenarios while maintaining the existing functionality of the component.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a minor modification to the coerceValue function in the SchemaIO plugin. A new conditional check has been added to handle cases where the schema parameter is undefined. When no schema is provided, the function will now immediately return the original value without attempting any further coercion, improving the function's robustness and preventing potential errors during schema-based value processing.

Changes

File Change Summary
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/index.tsx Added if (!schema) return value; to coerceValue function to handle undefined schema scenarios

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of schema delight,
When no schema comes into sight,
Just return the value true and bright,
No coercion needed, everything's right!
A simple guard, a coding might! 🔍


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/index.tsx (2)

Line range hint 67-81: Add TypeScript type annotations for better type safety.

Consider adding type annotations to improve type safety and maintainability:

-function coerceValue(value, schema) {
+interface Schema {
+  type: 'array' | 'string' | string;
+  // add other schema properties as needed
+}
+
+function coerceValue(value: unknown, schema?: Schema): unknown {

Line range hint 7-7: Add TypeScript interface for component props.

Consider adding a proper interface for the component's props to improve type safety:

interface SchemaIOComponentProps {
  onChange?: (state: unknown) => void;
  onPathChange?: (path: string, value: unknown, schema: unknown, state: unknown) => void;
  id: string;
  shouldClearUseKeyStores?: boolean;
  // add other props as needed
}

export function SchemaIOComponent(props: SchemaIOComponentProps) {
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5629fa1 and 6e64cdf.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/index.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/index.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: modified-files
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/index.tsx (2)

68-68: LGTM! Guard clause prevents unnecessary coercion.

The added check aligns with the PR objective to only coerce values when a schema is provided. This change improves the function's robustness by preventing unnecessary coercion attempts.


Line range hint 22-46: Verify schema presence in ancestor updates.

The onIOChange callback processes ancestor updates after the main value change. Ensure that all ancestor schemas are properly defined to maintain consistent coercion behavior across the component hierarchy.

Run this script to check for potential schema-less ancestor updates:

✅ Verification successful

Ancestor schema handling is implemented correctly

The implementation safely handles ancestor updates with proper type checking and default values. The coerceValue function's behavior is compatible with potentially undefined schemas, making the ancestor update logic robust and safe.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for ancestor schema usage patterns in the codebase
rg -A 5 "ancestorSchema|ancestors\[.*\]" 

Length of output: 939


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for ancestors object population and validation
ast-grep --pattern 'ancestors = {$$$}'
ast-grep --pattern 'ancestors[$$$] = $$$'
rg -B 5 "ancestors.*=" 

Length of output: 1473

@ritch
Copy link
Contributor Author

ritch commented Jan 14, 2025

This is a better solution

@ritch ritch closed this Jan 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants