Update secret names for the postgresql secret. #6115
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Michael Nelson <[email protected]>
✅ Deploy Preview for kubeapps-dev canceled.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of the change
While using the normal Makefile target to setup a dev env, I noticed it would fail because the postgresql db secret was missing the
passworddata field. Not sure if the chart updated recently to include validation of the data even though we don't use it, but I've taken the opportunity to remove thepostgres-postgres-passwordentry (don't remember why we ended up with that) and replace it with the missingpasswordentry.Benefits
Dev environment setup works.
Possible drawbacks
Applicable issues
Additional information