Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Model] H2O Danube3-4b #6451

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Jul 27, 2024
Merged

[Model] H2O Danube3-4b #6451

merged 19 commits into from
Jul 27, 2024

Conversation

g-eoj
Copy link
Contributor

@g-eoj g-eoj commented Jul 15, 2024

This PR mainly focuses on adding a head size of 120 for GPU inference, to support h2oai/h2o-danube3-4b-base.

Head sizes that are not a multiple of 16 aren't compatible with fp8 kv cache, so those tests are skipped.


PR Checklist (Click to Expand)

Thank you for your contribution to vLLM! Before submitting the pull request, please ensure the PR meets the following criteria. This helps vLLM maintain the code quality and improve the efficiency of the review process.

PR Title and Classification

Only specific types of PRs will be reviewed. The PR title is prefixed appropriately to indicate the type of change. Please use one of the following:

  • [Bugfix] for bug fixes.
  • [CI/Build] for build or continuous integration improvements.
  • [Doc] for documentation fixes and improvements.
  • [Model] for adding a new model or improving an existing model. Model name should appear in the title.
  • [Frontend] For changes on the vLLM frontend (e.g., OpenAI API server, LLM class, etc.)
  • [Kernel] for changes affecting CUDA kernels or other compute kernels.
  • [Core] for changes in the core vLLM logic (e.g., LLMEngine, AsyncLLMEngine, Scheduler, etc.)
  • [Hardware][Vendor] for hardware-specific changes. Vendor name should appear in the prefix (e.g., [Hardware][AMD]).
  • [Misc] for PRs that do not fit the above categories. Please use this sparingly.

Note: If the PR spans more than one category, please include all relevant prefixes.

Code Quality

The PR need to meet the following code quality standards:

  • We adhere to Google Python style guide and Google C++ style guide.
  • Pass all linter checks. Please use format.sh to format your code.
  • The code need to be well-documented to ensure future contributors can easily understand the code.
  • Include sufficient tests to ensure the project to stay correct and robust. This includes both unit tests and integration tests.
  • Please add documentation to docs/source/ if the PR modifies the user-facing behaviors of vLLM. It helps vLLM user understand and utilize the new features or changes.

Notes for Large Changes

Please keep the changes as concise as possible. For major architectural changes (>500 LOC excluding kernel/data/config/test), we would expect a GitHub issue (RFC) discussing the technical design and justification. Otherwise, we will tag it with rfc-required and might not go through the PR.

What to Expect for the Reviews

The goal of the vLLM team is to be a transparent reviewing machine. We would like to make the review process transparent and efficient and make sure no contributor feel confused or frustrated. However, the vLLM team is small, so we need to prioritize some PRs over others. Here is what you can expect from the review process:

  • After the PR is submitted, the PR will be assigned to a reviewer. Every reviewer will pick up the PRs based on their expertise and availability.
  • After the PR is assigned, the reviewer will provide status update every 2-3 days. If the PR is not reviewed within 7 days, please feel free to ping the reviewer or the vLLM team.
  • After the review, the reviewer will put an action-required label on the PR if there are changes required. The contributor should address the comments and ping the reviewer to re-review the PR.
  • Please respond to all comments within a reasonable time frame. If a comment isn't clear or you disagree with a suggestion, feel free to ask for clarification or discuss the suggestion.

Thank You

Finally, thank you for taking the time to read these guidelines and for your interest in contributing to vLLM. Your contributions make vLLM a great tool for everyone!

Copy link

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.
Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only trigger fastcheck CI to run, which consists only a small and essential subset of tests to quickly catch errors with the flexibility to run extra individual tests on top (you can do this by unblocking test steps in the Buildkite run).

Full CI run is still required to merge this PR so once the PR is ready to go, please make sure to run it. If you need all test signals in between PR commits, you can trigger full CI as well.

To run full CI, you can do one of these:

  • Comment /ready on the PR
  • Add ready label to the PR
  • Enable auto-merge.

🚀

@g-eoj
Copy link
Contributor Author

g-eoj commented Jul 18, 2024

/ready

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed label Jul 18, 2024
@pseudotensor
Copy link

If ready should you mark as not draft?

@g-eoj
Copy link
Contributor Author

g-eoj commented Jul 19, 2024

@pseudotensor it is not ready. That comment triggers the full test suite.

fp8 kv cache values are encoded as uint8. The element size of uint8 is 1.
16 divided by any int over 1 is going to be 8 or less which is
compatible with head size 120. But that doesn't happen with fp8, which
leads to test failures for head size 120.
@g-eoj g-eoj changed the title [Model] H2O Danube3 Collection [Model] H2O Danube3-4b Jul 22, 2024
@g-eoj g-eoj marked this pull request as ready for review July 23, 2024 22:20
@g-eoj
Copy link
Contributor Author

g-eoj commented Jul 23, 2024

The buildkite/ci-aws/pr/engine-test failure is not from this PR I think, so marking this ready for review.

@g-eoj
Copy link
Contributor Author

g-eoj commented Jul 25, 2024

@Yard1 I see your PR touches some the same files: #6667. Can you recommend someone to review this PR? I'm concerned I had it marked as a draft for too long and it fell off the radar.

@g-eoj
Copy link
Contributor Author

g-eoj commented Jul 26, 2024

@comaniac @rkooo567 can either of you recommend someone to review this PR? We're not sure if it is not accepted or just missed.

Copy link
Collaborator

@comaniac comaniac left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM as long as test passed.

@g-eoj
Copy link
Contributor Author

g-eoj commented Jul 27, 2024

@comaniac thank you for the quick response. All tests are passing now.

@comaniac comaniac merged commit 14dbd5a into vllm-project:main Jul 27, 2024
72 checks passed
achraf-mer added a commit to h2oai/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2024
achraf-mer added a commit to h2oai/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2024
kylesayrs pushed a commit to neuralmagic/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2024
Alvant pushed a commit to compressa-ai/vllm that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants