Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BugFix]: fix engine timeout due to request abort #6255

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2024

Conversation

pushan01
Copy link
Contributor

@pushan01 pushan01 commented Jul 9, 2024

In async llm engine, The request will be aborted after finished (async_llm_engine.py:L135), but the engine_step may still return True due to the difference between request finish and engine generate finish judgement. If the engine request is aborted but the engine_step return True, the step would be residual till next request arrive, which makes engine die due to timeout error if the next request arrive after ENGINE_ITERATION_TIMEOUT_S.

This PR fixed this problem by keep up with the engine_step and the request finish.

FILL IN THE PR DESCRIPTION HERE

FIX #6254 (link existing issues this PR will resolve)

image

BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ THE CHECKLIST BELOW AND FILL IN THE DESCRIPTION ABOVE


PR Checklist (Click to Expand)

Thank you for your contribution to vLLM! Before submitting the pull request, please ensure the PR meets the following criteria. This helps vLLM maintain the code quality and improve the efficiency of the review process.

PR Title and Classification

Only specific types of PRs will be reviewed. The PR title is prefixed appropriately to indicate the type of change. Please use one of the following:

  • [Bugfix] for bug fixes.
  • [CI/Build] for build or continuous integration improvements.
  • [Doc] for documentation fixes and improvements.
  • [Model] for adding a new model or improving an existing model. Model name should appear in the title.
  • [Frontend] For changes on the vLLM frontend (e.g., OpenAI API server, LLM class, etc.)
  • [Kernel] for changes affecting CUDA kernels or other compute kernels.
  • [Core] for changes in the core vLLM logic (e.g., LLMEngine, AsyncLLMEngine, Scheduler, etc.)
  • [Hardware][Vendor] for hardware-specific changes. Vendor name should appear in the prefix (e.g., [Hardware][AMD]).
  • [Misc] for PRs that do not fit the above categories. Please use this sparingly.

Note: If the PR spans more than one category, please include all relevant prefixes.

Code Quality

The PR need to meet the following code quality standards:

  • We adhere to Google Python style guide and Google C++ style guide.
  • Pass all linter checks. Please use format.sh to format your code.
  • The code need to be well-documented to ensure future contributors can easily understand the code.
  • Include sufficient tests to ensure the project to stay correct and robust. This includes both unit tests and integration tests.
  • Please add documentation to docs/source/ if the PR modifies the user-facing behaviors of vLLM. It helps vLLM user understand and utilize the new features or changes.

Notes for Large Changes

Please keep the changes as concise as possible. For major architectural changes (>500 LOC excluding kernel/data/config/test), we would expect a GitHub issue (RFC) discussing the technical design and justification. Otherwise, we will tag it with rfc-required and might not go through the PR.

What to Expect for the Reviews

The goal of the vLLM team is to be a transparent reviewing machine. We would like to make the review process transparent and efficient and make sure no contributor feel confused or frustrated. However, the vLLM team is small, so we need to prioritize some PRs over others. Here is what you can expect from the review process:

  • After the PR is submitted, the PR will be assigned to a reviewer. Every reviewer will pick up the PRs based on their expertise and availability.
  • After the PR is assigned, the reviewer will provide status update every 2-3 days. If the PR is not reviewed within 7 days, please feel free to ping the reviewer or the vLLM team.
  • After the review, the reviewer will put an action-required label on the PR if there are changes required. The contributor should address the comments and ping the reviewer to re-review the PR.
  • Please respond to all comments within a reasonable time frame. If a comment isn't clear or you disagree with a suggestion, feel free to ask for clarification or discuss the suggestion.

Thank You

Finally, thank you for taking the time to read these guidelines and for your interest in contributing to vLLM. Your contributions make vLLM a great tool for everyone!

@pushan01 pushan01 changed the title fix(async_engine): fix engine timeout due to request abort [BugFix]: fix engine timeout due to request abort Jul 9, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@Yard1 Yard1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense, thanks

for request_output in request_outputs:
self._request_tracker.process_request_output(
request_output, verbose=self.log_requests)
finished = finished or request_output.finished
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this be and, actually? we should stop only if all requests are finished.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@pushan01 pushan01 Jul 10, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. I have rectified it, Thanks.

@pushan01 pushan01 force-pushed the dev/fix_engine_timeout branch 3 times, most recently from 1fd1598 to cd6179d Compare July 10, 2024 02:49
@pushan01 pushan01 requested a review from Yard1 July 10, 2024 02:55
Copy link
Member

@njhill njhill left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @pushan01! I think these fixes are also needed though

vllm/engine/async_llm_engine.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
vllm/engine/async_llm_engine.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
In async llm engine, The request will be aborted after finished `(async_llm_engine.py:L135`), but the `engine_step` may still return `True` due to the difference between request finish and engine generate finish judgement. If the engine request is aborted and but the `engine_step` return `True`, the step would be residual till next request arrive, which makes engine die due to timeout error if the next request arrive after ENGINE_ITERATION_TIMEOUT_S.

This PR fixed this problem by keep up with the engine_step and the request finish.

Signed-off-by: yatta zhang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: zhangyuntao.dev <[email protected]>
@njhill njhill merged commit 546b101 into vllm-project:main Jul 11, 2024
71 checks passed
adityagoel14 pushed a commit to adityagoel14/vllm-torchrun-test that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2024
Signed-off-by: yatta zhang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: zhangyuntao.dev <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: zhangyuntao.dev <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 546b101)
dtrifiro pushed a commit to opendatahub-io/vllm that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2024
Signed-off-by: yatta zhang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: zhangyuntao.dev <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: zhangyuntao.dev <[email protected]>
xjpang pushed a commit to xjpang/vllm that referenced this pull request Jul 24, 2024
Signed-off-by: yatta zhang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: zhangyuntao.dev <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: zhangyuntao.dev <[email protected]>
Alvant pushed a commit to compressa-ai/vllm that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2024
Signed-off-by: yatta zhang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: zhangyuntao.dev <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: zhangyuntao.dev <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alvant <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Engine timeout error due to request step residual
3 participants