-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BugFix]: fix engine timeout due to request abort #6255
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense, thanks
vllm/engine/async_llm_engine.py
Outdated
for request_output in request_outputs: | ||
self._request_tracker.process_request_output( | ||
request_output, verbose=self.log_requests) | ||
finished = finished or request_output.finished |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should this be and, actually? we should stop only if all requests are finished.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. I have rectified it, Thanks.
1fd1598
to
cd6179d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @pushan01! I think these fixes are also needed though
In async llm engine, The request will be aborted after finished `(async_llm_engine.py:L135`), but the `engine_step` may still return `True` due to the difference between request finish and engine generate finish judgement. If the engine request is aborted and but the `engine_step` return `True`, the step would be residual till next request arrive, which makes engine die due to timeout error if the next request arrive after ENGINE_ITERATION_TIMEOUT_S. This PR fixed this problem by keep up with the engine_step and the request finish. Signed-off-by: yatta zhang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: zhangyuntao.dev <[email protected]>
cd6179d
to
06af52d
Compare
Signed-off-by: yatta zhang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: zhangyuntao.dev <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: zhangyuntao.dev <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 546b101)
Signed-off-by: yatta zhang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: zhangyuntao.dev <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: zhangyuntao.dev <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: yatta zhang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: zhangyuntao.dev <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: zhangyuntao.dev <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: yatta zhang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: zhangyuntao.dev <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: zhangyuntao.dev <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alvant <[email protected]>
In async llm engine, The request will be aborted after finished
(async_llm_engine.py:L135
), but theengine_step
may still returnTrue
due to the difference between request finish and engine generate finish judgement. If the engine request is aborted but theengine_step
returnTrue
, the step would be residual till next request arrive, which makes engine die due to timeout error if the next request arrive after ENGINE_ITERATION_TIMEOUT_S.This PR fixed this problem by keep up with the engine_step and the request finish.
FILL IN THE PR DESCRIPTION HERE
FIX #6254 (link existing issues this PR will resolve)
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ THE CHECKLIST BELOW AND FILL IN THE DESCRIPTION ABOVE
PR Checklist (Click to Expand)
Thank you for your contribution to vLLM! Before submitting the pull request, please ensure the PR meets the following criteria. This helps vLLM maintain the code quality and improve the efficiency of the review process.
PR Title and Classification
Only specific types of PRs will be reviewed. The PR title is prefixed appropriately to indicate the type of change. Please use one of the following:
[Bugfix]
for bug fixes.[CI/Build]
for build or continuous integration improvements.[Doc]
for documentation fixes and improvements.[Model]
for adding a new model or improving an existing model. Model name should appear in the title.[Frontend]
For changes on the vLLM frontend (e.g., OpenAI API server,LLM
class, etc.)[Kernel]
for changes affecting CUDA kernels or other compute kernels.[Core]
for changes in the core vLLM logic (e.g.,LLMEngine
,AsyncLLMEngine
,Scheduler
, etc.)[Hardware][Vendor]
for hardware-specific changes. Vendor name should appear in the prefix (e.g.,[Hardware][AMD]
).[Misc]
for PRs that do not fit the above categories. Please use this sparingly.Note: If the PR spans more than one category, please include all relevant prefixes.
Code Quality
The PR need to meet the following code quality standards:
format.sh
to format your code.docs/source/
if the PR modifies the user-facing behaviors of vLLM. It helps vLLM user understand and utilize the new features or changes.Notes for Large Changes
Please keep the changes as concise as possible. For major architectural changes (>500 LOC excluding kernel/data/config/test), we would expect a GitHub issue (RFC) discussing the technical design and justification. Otherwise, we will tag it with
rfc-required
and might not go through the PR.What to Expect for the Reviews
The goal of the vLLM team is to be a transparent reviewing machine. We would like to make the review process transparent and efficient and make sure no contributor feel confused or frustrated. However, the vLLM team is small, so we need to prioritize some PRs over others. Here is what you can expect from the review process:
action-required
label on the PR if there are changes required. The contributor should address the comments and ping the reviewer to re-review the PR.Thank You
Finally, thank you for taking the time to read these guidelines and for your interest in contributing to vLLM. Your contributions make vLLM a great tool for everyone!