-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Bugfix] Revert to aioprometheus to avoid 307 redirect #4511
[Bugfix] Revert to aioprometheus to avoid 307 redirect #4511
Conversation
# begin-metrics-definitions | ||
class Metrics: | ||
labelname_finish_reason = "finished_reason" | ||
|
||
def __init__(self, labelnames: List[str], max_model_len: int): | ||
# Unregister any existing vLLM collectors |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was a hack to enable our CI to pass before
REGISTRY
is a global value. We were touching internal state since our CI runs LLM
twice
I just updated the CI to run with --forked
which obviate the need for this hack
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We had problems using --forked before due to cuda issue (and we removed it). #3631
Seems like metrics test also use the vllm instances, and I am a little concern it will introduce the similar issue again. Why don't we just keep this hack instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As long as the test does not import torch, —forked is fine
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IIUC, the vllm runner should import torch? https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/main/tests/metrics/test_metrics.py
@@ -15,72 +14,51 @@ | |||
|
|||
logger = init_logger(__name__) | |||
|
|||
disable_created_metrics() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do not understand what this does / why it was there before, but the equivalent does not seem to exist for aioprometheus
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
REGISTRY.unregister(collector) | ||
|
||
# Config Information | ||
self.info_cache_config = Info( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This had to be removed since Info
does not exist in aioprometheus
AFAIK
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Just one comment related to --forked usage..
# begin-metrics-definitions | ||
class Metrics: | ||
labelname_finish_reason = "finished_reason" | ||
|
||
def __init__(self, labelnames: List[str], max_model_len: int): | ||
# Unregister any existing vLLM collectors |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We had problems using --forked before due to cuda issue (and we removed it). #3631
Seems like metrics test also use the vllm instances, and I am a little concern it will introduce the similar issue again. Why don't we just keep this hack instead?
The redirect, while annoying, was technically harmless. If possible I'd like to keep using As mentioned in prometheus/client_python#1016, the issue is that One simple solution that works is to change the import re
from starlette.routing import Mount
...
# Add prometheus asgi middleware to route /metrics requests
route = Mount("/metrics", make_asgi_app())
route.path_regex = re.compile('^/metrics(?P<path>.*)$')
app.routes.append(route) This allows any path that starts with |
(N.B. I've edited my previous comment so it you're only looking at this via email you won't have the latest update) |
@hmellor is there any performance implications to matching a regex? Forgive me, my understanding of FastAPI is limited |
I don't think so.
I'll explain my solution a little more, I'm also learning as I go. def mount(
self, path: str, app: ASGIApp, name: str | None = None
) -> None: # pragma: nocover
route = Mount(path, app=app, name=name)
self.routes.append(route) So, I am bringing the creation and appending of The This regex is used in By changing the In conclusion, this change is only to the value of a regex pattern and does not modify the execution of any functions in |
Okay great, this approach works then |
Ill make a PR today |
Reverts prometheus logging from
prometheus_client
back toaioprometheus
to avoid307 Temporary Redirect
FIX #2730 (comment)
At current, we get:
Note: this PR breaks some existing functionality
cache_info
prometheus_client
are goneI also tweaked the name of a label (nit from prior PR). We did not publish a release with that label (merged over the weekend), so I think this is okay
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ THE CHECKLIST BELOW AND FILL IN THE DESCRIPTION ABOVE
PR Checklist (Click to Expand)
Thank you for your contribution to vLLM! Before submitting the pull request, please ensure the PR meets the following criteria. This helps vLLM maintain the code quality and improve the efficiency of the review process.
PR Title and Classification
Only specific types of PRs will be reviewed. The PR title is prefixed appropriately to indicate the type of change. Please use one of the following:
[Bugfix]
for bug fixes.[CI/Build]
for build or continuous integration improvements.[Doc]
for documentation fixes and improvements.[Model]
for adding a new model or improving an existing model. Model name should appear in the title.[Frontend]
For changes on the vLLM frontend (e.g., OpenAI API server,LLM
class, etc.)[Kernel]
for changes affecting CUDA kernels or other compute kernels.[Core]
for changes in the core vLLM logic (e.g.,LLMEngine
,AsyncLLMEngine
,Scheduler
, etc.)[Hardware][Vendor]
for hardware-specific changes. Vendor name should appear in the prefix (e.g.,[Hardware][AMD]
).[Misc]
for PRs that do not fit the above categories. Please use this sparingly.Note: If the PR spans more than one category, please include all relevant prefixes.
Code Quality
The PR need to meet the following code quality standards:
format.sh
to format your code.docs/source/
if the PR modifies the user-facing behaviors of vLLM. It helps vLLM user understand and utilize the new features or changes.Notes for Large Changes
Please keep the changes as concise as possible. For major architectural changes (>500 LOC excluding kernel/data/config/test), we would expect a GitHub issue (RFC) discussing the technical design and justification. Otherwise, we will tag it with
rfc-required
and might not go through the PR.What to Expect for the Reviews
The goal of the vLLM team is to be a transparent reviewing machine. We would like to make the review process transparent and efficient and make sure no contributor feel confused or frustrated. However, the vLLM team is small, so we need to prioritize some PRs over others. Here is what you can expect from the review process:
action-required
label on the PR if there are changes required. The contributor should address the comments and ping the reviewer to re-review the PR.Thank You
Finally, thank you for taking the time to read these guidelines and for your interest in contributing to vLLM. Your contributions make vLLM a great tool for everyone!