Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: os.cpu() should be os.cpus() #4634

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 1, 2023
Merged

Conversation

KermanX
Copy link
Contributor

@KermanX KermanX commented Dec 1, 2023

Description

os.cpu() should be os.cpus() in config docs.

Please don't delete this checklist! Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following:

  • It's really useful if your PR references an issue where it is discussed ahead of time. If the feature is substantial or introduces breaking changes without a discussion, PR might be closed.
  • Ideally, include a test that fails without this PR but passes with it.
  • Please, don't make changes to pnpm-lock.yaml unless you introduce a new test example.

Tests

  • Run the tests with pnpm test:ci.

Documentation

  • If you introduce new functionality, document it. You can run documentation with pnpm run docs command.

Changesets

  • Changes in changelog are generated from PR name. Please, make sure that it explains your changes in an understandable manner. Please, prefix changeset messages with feat:, fix:, perf:, docs:, or chore:.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 1, 2023

Deploy Preview for fastidious-cascaron-4ded94 canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit c3dd26b
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/fastidious-cascaron-4ded94/deploys/6569e4f9ad08d80008a542d7

Copy link
Member

@AriPerkkio AriPerkkio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same change is needed here on JSDoc:

/**
* Concurrency limit used when processing the coverage results.
* Defaults to `Math.min(20, os.cpu().length)`
*/
processingConcurrency?: number

@AriPerkkio AriPerkkio merged commit ceca93d into vitest-dev:main Dec 1, 2023
15 of 16 checks passed
LorenzoBloedow pushed a commit to LorenzoBloedow/vitest that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants