xtrabackup: Add a buffered reader in front of xtrabackup's stdout pipe. #5666
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The buffered reader implements WriteTo(), which allows io.CopyN() to avoid allocating a new buffer every time. Signed-off-by: Anthony Yeh <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The buffered reader implements
WriteTo(), which allowsio.CopyN()to avoid allocating a new buffer every time.From the flamegraph in #5613, we can see that there is a decent-sized chunk attributed directly to
io.copyBuffer(excluding its descendants). This change should eliminate that one section, although it's unlikely this is the real cause of #5613.