Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use proper zstd decoder pool for binlog event compression handling #17042

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024

Conversation

mattlord
Copy link
Contributor

@mattlord mattlord commented Oct 22, 2024

Description

This is a follow-up to #16328. There we added usage of sync.Pool, however when putting the object back in the pool we used the wrong pool. Instead of using the statelessDocoderPool we were using another sync.Pool instance that also existed in the package: readersPool.

This caused the statelessDocoderPool to NOT be used, but worse than that it could cause a panic when the readersPool was used here IF --mysql-server-pool-conn-read-buffers was set (defaults to false): https://github.com/planetscale/vitess/blob/4522a0ad8930f3556627ec1ebbe69103f3b0fc01/go/mysql/conn.go#L290-L292

We should backport this to v21 as that's the first release that contains #16328.

Related Issue(s)

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported to release branches
  • If this change is to be back-ported to previous releases, a justification is included in the PR description
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Oct 22, 2024

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Oct 22, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v22.0.0 milestone Oct 22, 2024
@mattlord mattlord added Backport to: release-21.0 Needs to be backport to release-21.0 and removed NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Oct 22, 2024
Signed-off-by: Matt Lord <[email protected]>
go/mysql/binlog_event_compression.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mattlord mattlord removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Oct 22, 2024
@mattlord mattlord marked this pull request as ready for review October 22, 2024 18:53
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 22, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 73.52941% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 67.15%. Comparing base (d651a42) to head (e7191f0).
Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
go/mysql/binlog_event_compression.go 73.52% 9 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #17042   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   67.15%   67.15%           
=======================================
  Files        1571     1571           
  Lines      251836   251876   +40     
=======================================
+ Hits       169110   169146   +36     
- Misses      82726    82730    +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

}
return d
},
panic(fmt.Errorf("failed to create stateless decoder: %v", err))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we panic here and prevent the process from launching? Option is for the decompress() to return an error if statefulDecoderPool failed to initialize.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@mattlord mattlord Oct 22, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's better to panic, I think, as this is only allocated once at init() time. If we can't initialize it, we won't be able to run properly. The way the code was previously, it would just continually log errors w/o being able to do much. This should only ever fail if you're very low on memory (ENOMEM). This isn't the decoder pool here, it's the global shared stateless decoder used for smaller payloads.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only for compressed payloads, right? Is it documented that this failure can only happen for ENOMEM. In case there is some other issue with zstd preventing the executable from launching seems excessive and risky.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, that's true.... maybe I'll just go back to logging like I was before then. It also has the benefit of limiting the changes.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I went ahead and got rid of the panic and init(): e7191f0

No reason for us NOT to try initializing it again the next time we retry...

go/mysql/binlog_event_compression.go Show resolved Hide resolved
go/mysql/binlog_event_compression.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
go/mysql/binlog_event_compression_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
go/mysql/binlog_event_compression_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
go/mysql/binlog_event_compression_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
go/mysql/binlog_event_compression_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Matt Lord <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@rohit-nayak-ps rohit-nayak-ps left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will let you decide on the panic.

Otherwise lgtm.

And do it as a JiT allocation

Signed-off-by: Matt Lord <[email protected]>
@mattlord mattlord added Component: VReplication and removed NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request labels Oct 22, 2024
@mattlord mattlord merged commit 2203cfb into vitessio:main Oct 22, 2024
98 of 100 checks passed
@mattlord mattlord deleted the compressed_binlogs_fix branch October 22, 2024 20:34
frouioui pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2024
…ion handling (#17042) (#17045)

Signed-off-by: Matt Lord <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: vitess-bot[bot] <108069721+vitess-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug Report: Incorrect sync.Pool usage in compressed transaction payload handling
4 participants