Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

vttablet api distributed transaction changes #16506

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 7, 2024

Conversation

harshit-gangal
Copy link
Member

@harshit-gangal harshit-gangal commented Jul 30, 2024

Description

This PR make few changes to the distributed transactions API on the vttablet

  • Prepare API to rollback and release the transaction when
    • no DML is executed on the transaction (no error to return)
    • DML executed on a reserved connection (return error as well to fail the prepare)
  • CommitPrepare API to log a warning if failed to commit a transaction
  • StartCommit API to fail if executed on a reserved connection and mark the transaction state to ROLLBACK

Related Issue(s)

Checklist

  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Deployment Notes

Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Jul 30, 2024

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Jul 30, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v21.0.0 milestone Jul 30, 2024
@harshit-gangal harshit-gangal added Type: Feature Component: Query Serving and removed NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Jul 30, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 30, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 95.83333% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.76%. Comparing base (4a89749) to head (921c55f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
go/vt/vttablet/tabletserver/dt_executor.go 95.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #16506      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.74%   68.76%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1556     1556              
  Lines      199705   199715      +10     
==========================================
+ Hits       137292   137334      +42     
+ Misses      62413    62381      -32     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

…ection, log warn on failing to commit a prepare transaction, fail to accept a commit on MM

Signed-off-by: Harshit Gangal <[email protected]>
@harshit-gangal harshit-gangal removed the NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work label Aug 6, 2024
@harshit-gangal harshit-gangal marked this pull request as ready for review August 6, 2024 10:19
@harshit-gangal harshit-gangal merged commit d042d7c into vitessio:main Aug 7, 2024
129 checks passed
@harshit-gangal harshit-gangal deleted the tx-idempotent branch August 7, 2024 05:40
venkatraju pushed a commit to slackhq/vitess that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants