Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

evalengine: Fix temporal cases in MAKETIME #15709

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 15, 2024

Conversation

beingnoble03
Copy link
Member

Description

Precision for time, datetime and timestamp, is the number of decimals in fractional second.
We missed this in MAKETIME

Previously, the tests failed for MAKETIME(1, 2, time'00:00:01.0000') as the function returned TIME("01:02:01.000000") instead of TIME("01:02:01.0000") which wasn't correct as there are 4 decimals in the fractional second on time'00:00:01.0000'.

Related Issue(s)

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported to release branches
  • If this change is to be back-ported to previous releases, a justification is included in the PR description
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Deployment Notes

Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Apr 15, 2024

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Apr 15, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v20.0.0 milestone Apr 15, 2024
@beingnoble03 beingnoble03 added Type: Enhancement Logical improvement (somewhere between a bug and feature) Component: Evalengine changes to the evaluation engine and removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Apr 15, 2024
@@ -3934,6 +3934,34 @@ func (asm *assembler) Fn_MAKETIME_i() {
}, "FN MAKETIME INT64(SP-3) INT64(SP-2) INT64(SP-1)")
}

func (asm *assembler) Fn_MAKETIME_D() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We're using a lowercase d as the suffix for other decimal related functions, so let's also keep using that here.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we already have Fn_MAKETIME_d for decimal cases, Fn_MAKETIME_D is for the temporal cases, like the one in DATEADD Fn_DATEADD_D

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@beingnoble03 ah, sorry, you're right!

go/vt/vtgate/evalengine/fn_time.go Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 15, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 86.95652% with 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.41%. Comparing base (f118ba2) to head (31bc71b).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
go/vt/vtgate/evalengine/compiler_asm.go 85.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #15709   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   68.40%   68.41%           
=======================================
  Files        1556     1556           
  Lines      195121   195168   +47     
=======================================
+ Hits       133479   133518   +39     
- Misses      61642    61650    +8     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Signed-off-by: Noble Mittal <[email protected]>
@dbussink dbussink merged commit 81e8f0c into vitessio:main Apr 15, 2024
101 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Component: Evalengine changes to the evaluation engine Type: Enhancement Logical improvement (somewhere between a bug and feature)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants