Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-16.0] Fix benchmarks in plan_test.go (#13096) #13126

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 20, 2023

Conversation

vitess-bot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot commented May 22, 2023

Description

This is a backport of #13096.

@vitess-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

vitess-bot bot commented May 22, 2023

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • If this is a change that users need to know about, please apply the release notes (needs details) label so that merging is blocked unless the summary release notes document is included.
  • If a test is added or modified, there should be a documentation on top of the test to explain what the expected behavior is what the test does.

If a new flag is being introduced:

  • Is it really necessary to add this flag?
  • Flag names should be clear and intuitive (as far as possible)
  • Help text should be descriptive.
  • Flag names should use dashes (-) as word separators rather than underscores (_).

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow should be required, the maintainer team should be notified.

Bug fixes

  • There should be at least one unit or end-to-end test.
  • The Pull Request description should include a link to an issue that describes the bug.

Non-trivial changes

  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.

New/Existing features

  • Should be documented, either by modifying the existing documentation or creating new documentation.
  • New features should have a link to a feature request issue or an RFC that documents the use cases, corner cases and test cases.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from VTop, if used there.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added Component: Query Serving Type: Testing NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels May 22, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v16.0.3 milestone May 22, 2023
@frouioui frouioui removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request labels May 22, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is being marked as stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. To rectify, you may do any of the following:

  • Push additional commits to the associated branch.
  • Remove the stale label.
  • Add a comment indicating why it is not stale.

If no action is taken within 7 days, this PR will be closed.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale Marks PRs as stale after a period of inactivity, which are then closed after a grace period. label Jun 24, 2023
@frouioui frouioui removed the Stale Marks PRs as stale after a period of inactivity, which are then closed after a grace period. label Jun 26, 2023
Signed-off-by: Florent Poinsard <[email protected]>
@frouioui frouioui force-pushed the backport-13096-to-release-16.0 branch from 20a83b8 to 8be327d Compare July 20, 2023 10:31
@frouioui frouioui merged commit c3e1658 into release-16.0 Jul 20, 2023
@frouioui frouioui deleted the backport-13096-to-release-16.0 branch July 20, 2023 13:30
@hmaurer hmaurer mentioned this pull request Mar 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants