Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-16.0] planner fix: scoping rules for JOIN ON expression inside a subquery #12891

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 14, 2023

Conversation

frouioui
Copy link
Member

Description

This is a backport of #12881

harshit-gangal and others added 2 commits April 14, 2023 00:35
…itessio#12881)

* fix: scoping rules for on clause expression inside a subquery

Signed-off-by: Harshit Gangal <[email protected]>

* find the parent scope of the statement in on clause

Signed-off-by: harshit-gangal <[email protected]>

* addressed review comments

Signed-off-by: harshit-gangal <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Harshit Gangal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: harshit-gangal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Florent Poinsard <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Florent Poinsard <[email protected]>
@frouioui frouioui added Type: Bug Type: Enhancement Logical improvement (somewhere between a bug and feature) Component: Query Serving Backport This is a backport labels Apr 13, 2023
@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Apr 13, 2023
@vitess-bot
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Apr 13, 2023

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • If this is a change that users need to know about, please apply the release notes (needs details) label so that merging is blocked unless the summary release notes document is included.
  • If a test is added or modified, there should be a documentation on top of the test to explain what the expected behavior is what the test does.

If a new flag is being introduced:

  • Is it really necessary to add this flag?
  • Flag names should be clear and intuitive (as far as possible)
  • Help text should be descriptive.
  • Flag names should use dashes (-) as word separators rather than underscores (_).

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow should be required, the maintainer team should be notified.

Bug fixes

  • There should be at least one unit or end-to-end test.
  • The Pull Request description should include a link to an issue that describes the bug.

Non-trivial changes

  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.

New/Existing features

  • Should be documented, either by modifying the existing documentation or creating new documentation.
  • New features should have a link to a feature request issue or an RFC that documents the use cases, corner cases and test cases.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from VTop, if used there.

@frouioui frouioui removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Apr 13, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v16.0.2 milestone Apr 13, 2023
@frouioui frouioui merged commit e18974d into vitessio:release-16.0 Apr 14, 2023
@frouioui frouioui deleted the bp-12881-on-16 branch April 14, 2023 09:22
@hmaurer hmaurer mentioned this pull request Mar 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Backport This is a backport Component: Query Serving Type: Bug Type: Enhancement Logical improvement (somewhere between a bug and feature)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants