Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(ssr): robust regexp to check cjs content #6053

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 13, 2021

Conversation

ygj6
Copy link
Member

@ygj6 ygj6 commented Dec 10, 2021

Description

Some dependencies can be externalized

Additional context


What is the purpose of this pull request?

  • Bug fix
  • New Feature
  • Documentation update
  • Other

Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following

  • Read the Contributing Guidelines.
  • Read the Pull Request Guidelines and follow the Commit Convention.
  • Check that there isn't already a PR that solves the problem the same way to avoid creating a duplicate.
  • Provide a description in this PR that addresses what the PR is solving, or reference the issue that it solves (e.g. fixes #123).
  • Ideally, include relevant tests that fail without this PR but pass with it.

@ygj6 ygj6 changed the title fix: robust regexp to check cjs content fix(ssr): robust regexp to check cjs content Dec 10, 2021
@@ -157,7 +157,9 @@ function collectExternals(
}
// check if the entry is cjs
const content = fs.readFileSync(esmEntry, 'utf-8')
if (/\bmodule\.exports\b|\bexports[.\[]|\brequire\s*\(/.test(content)) {
const CJS_CONTENT_RE =
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion: We could move this constant out of the function scope

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

bluwy
bluwy previously approved these changes Dec 11, 2021
@patak-dev patak-dev merged commit 0373441 into vitejs:main Dec 13, 2021
@patak-dev
Copy link
Member

Thanks @ygj6 🙌🏼

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants