mocha browser runner is 10-100x slower than jasmine on equivalent suites #763
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
So @tmcw and I were petitioning to convert Leaflet's test suite to mocha and @mourner brought it to our attention that the result ran ten times slower (2s with mocha vs 0.2s with Jasmine).
I reproduced a similar slowdown in a simple benchmark which does nothing but execute 500 examples. Jasmine does it in about 0.1s, Mocha 3s.
I suspect Mocha is hitting a wall due to the latency of window.postMessage used by the
process.nextTick
implementation. Replacing this implementation with synchronous execution offn
leads to a sizable performance improvement (but of course regresses #153).I guess to improve this mocha will need a nextTick worker queue and some manual scheduling logic, so that multiple ticks can run in each setTimeout/postMessage "timeslice".