Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add get_prop_names methods for scan results #297

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 8, 2024

Conversation

haoxins
Copy link
Contributor

@haoxins haoxins commented Jan 2, 2024

What type of PR is this?

  • bug
  • feature
  • enhancement

What problem(s) does this PR solve?

Issue(s) number:

Description:

How do you solve it?

Special notes for your reviewer, ex. impact of this fix, design document, etc:

@haoxins haoxins force-pushed the feat-add-prop-names branch from 04f1885 to eb751e3 Compare January 3, 2024 02:59
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 3, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (469e25f) 77.88% compared to head (844e7e4) 77.83%.

Files Patch % Lines
nebula3/sclient/BaseResult.py 50.00% 2 Missing ⚠️

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #297      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.88%   77.83%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          18       18              
  Lines        2419     2423       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits         1884     1886       +2     
- Misses        535      537       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Nicole00
Nicole00 previously approved these changes Jan 5, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@Nicole00 Nicole00 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great job! Thanks for your contribution.

@Nicole00
Copy link
Contributor

Nicole00 commented Jan 5, 2024

Could you please check the ci for 3.12?

@wey-gu
Copy link
Contributor

wey-gu commented Jan 5, 2024

@haoxins could you please help run pip-compile requirements/dev.in to regenerate the dev.txt?

wey-gu
wey-gu previously approved these changes Jan 5, 2024
@haoxins haoxins dismissed stale reviews from wey-gu and Nicole00 via 8d7c578 January 5, 2024 08:28
@haoxins
Copy link
Contributor Author

haoxins commented Jan 5, 2024

@haoxins could you please help run pip-compile requirements/dev.in to regenerate the dev.txt?

@wey-gu done

@haoxins haoxins force-pushed the feat-add-prop-names branch from 8d7c578 to c95af5d Compare January 5, 2024 08:32
@haoxins haoxins requested review from wey-gu and Nicole00 January 5, 2024 08:32
@haoxins
Copy link
Contributor Author

haoxins commented Jan 5, 2024

can we drop support for <3.9?

@wey-gu
Copy link
Contributor

wey-gu commented Jan 5, 2024

can we drop support for <3.9?

I think it's fair(as of 2024 Jan) to drop py3.8.

cc @Nicole00 We need to add this to the release note, but it's to me reasonable for now to support py3.9+

@wey-gu wey-gu requested a review from HarrisChu January 7, 2024 07:45
@Nicole00 Nicole00 merged commit fce0b09 into vesoft-inc:master Jan 8, 2024
5 checks passed
@haoxins haoxins deleted the feat-add-prop-names branch January 8, 2024 03:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants