Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[turborepo] Turbo prune failing #3638

Closed
LufyCZ opened this issue Feb 4, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3656
Closed

[turborepo] Turbo prune failing #3638

LufyCZ opened this issue Feb 4, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3656
Assignees
Labels
kind: bug Something isn't working

Comments

@LufyCZ
Copy link

LufyCZ commented Feb 4, 2023

What version of Turborepo are you using?

1.7.3

What package manager are you using / does the bug impact?

pnpm

What operating system are you using?

Linux

Describe the Bug

Our CD started failing after the introduction of [email protected], which we're using to prune the monorepo to reduce size. It looks like it's got to do with a specific dependency, namely @nomiclabs/hardhat-ethers@npm:[email protected], though [email protected] appears in the log as well.

Tested on 1.7.0-1.7.2, works perfectly there.

image

Expected Behavior

image

To Reproduce

pnpm i -g [email protected]
git clone https://github.com/sushiswap/sushiswap.git
cd sushiswap
turbo prune --scope=earn

Reproduction Repo

http://github.com/sushiswap/sushiswap

@LufyCZ LufyCZ added area: turborepo kind: bug Something isn't working labels Feb 4, 2023
@chris-olszewski chris-olszewski self-assigned this Feb 6, 2023
chris-olszewski added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 7, 2023
Fixes #3638

I added a regression in #3611 where we would error if there was a
specifier mismatch and the specifier wasn't totally resolved. This was
an unintended change to the previous behavior would indicate it didn't
find a package resolution.

Tested against [provided
reproduction](https://github.com/sushiswap/sushiswap)
chris-olszewski added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 14, 2023
### Description

This is a follow up to #4541 that fixes the underlying issue. We now
will attempt to return the extracted version instead of the full key
when we encounter one.

A quick explanation for how this happened is that when [pnpm
aliases](https://pnpm.io/aliases) are used the resolved version in the
lockfile will be the full lockfile key instead of a version since the
name won't match the specifier (e.g. `"foo: npm:bar@^1.0.0"` will have a
version of `/bar/1.0.0` instead of just `1.0.0`). This is all fine
unless an external dependency also depends on `[email protected]` then we get a
dependency of `Package{Key: "/bar/1.0.0", Version: "1.0.0"}` when going
through the external dependency where we would get `Package{Key:
"/bar/1.0.0", Version: "/bar/1.0.0"}` going through the workspace with
the alias.

### Testing Instructions

Updated the unit test added in the initial PR to reflect that we're no
longer getting a package with a version that's actually a lockfile key.
This change also changes the test for pnpm overrides, but this change is
more correct as we're now only returning the version. I also tested that
the changes don't trigger the repro that was provided in #3638
NicholasLYang pushed a commit to NicholasLYang/turbo that referenced this issue Apr 21, 2023
### Description

This is a follow up to vercel#4541 that fixes the underlying issue. We now
will attempt to return the extracted version instead of the full key
when we encounter one.

A quick explanation for how this happened is that when [pnpm
aliases](https://pnpm.io/aliases) are used the resolved version in the
lockfile will be the full lockfile key instead of a version since the
name won't match the specifier (e.g. `"foo: npm:bar@^1.0.0"` will have a
version of `/bar/1.0.0` instead of just `1.0.0`). This is all fine
unless an external dependency also depends on `[email protected]` then we get a
dependency of `Package{Key: "/bar/1.0.0", Version: "1.0.0"}` when going
through the external dependency where we would get `Package{Key:
"/bar/1.0.0", Version: "/bar/1.0.0"}` going through the workspace with
the alias.

### Testing Instructions

Updated the unit test added in the initial PR to reflect that we're no
longer getting a package with a version that's actually a lockfile key.
This change also changes the test for pnpm overrides, but this change is
more correct as we're now only returning the version. I also tested that
the changes don't trigger the repro that was provided in vercel#3638
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind: bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants