-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Add stricter check for "use server" exports #62821
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ | ||
--- | ||
title: 'Invalid "use server" Value' | ||
--- | ||
|
||
## Why This Error Occurred | ||
|
||
This error occurs when a `"use server"` file exports a value that is not an async function. It might happen when you unintentionally export something like a configuration object, an arbitrary value, or missed the `async` keyword in the exported function declaration. | ||
|
||
These functions are required to be defined as async, because `"use server"` marks them as [Server Actions](https://nextjs.org/docs/app/building-your-application/data-fetching/server-actions-and-mutations) and they can be invoked directly from the client through a network request. | ||
|
||
Examples of incorrect code: | ||
|
||
```js | ||
'use server' | ||
|
||
// ❌ This is incorrect: only async functions are allowed. | ||
export const value = 1 | ||
|
||
// ❌ This is incorrect: missed the `async` keyword. | ||
export function getServerData() { | ||
return '...' | ||
} | ||
``` | ||
|
||
Correct code: | ||
|
||
```js | ||
'use server' | ||
|
||
// ✅ This is correct: an async function is exported. | ||
export async function getServerData() { | ||
return '...' | ||
} | ||
``` | ||
|
||
## Possible Ways to Fix It | ||
|
||
Check all exported values in the `"use server"` file (including `export *`) and make sure that they are all defined as async functions. | ||
|
||
## Useful Links | ||
|
||
- [Server Actions and Mutations - Next.js](https://nextjs.org/docs/app/building-your-application/data-fetching/server-actions-and-mutations) | ||
- ['use server' directive - React](https://react.dev/reference/react/use-server) |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This bit is actually quite annoying for library authors tho, any plan where this will get improved in the future?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree. It also breaks the use of Zod for validating the input of Server Actions (this worked before):